2011 SALARY CAP UPDATE: Why the Ravens aren’t active in free agency

Print Ravens 2013 Schedule
wizardofozzie-notext1

1.       Impact of “Black Money” Releases:

It’s been reported that the “Black Monday” releases of WR Derrick Mason, TE Todd Heap, RB Willis McGahee and DT Kelly Gregg has created $18.6M in Salary Cap space for the team. But that number isn’t entirely accurate.  The release of those players does remove $18.6M of what was attributable to those players (leaving $4.857M in “dead money” still counting against the 2011 Cap), but the overall impact on the Cap is a little less. 

Why?

Well at this time of the year, the Rule of 51 applies, which means that only the highest 51 base salaries and all bonus money attributable to 2011 count against the Cap.  So, when you remove 4 players who counted amongst the top 51, you have to add 4 players back in to replace them.  The net result then – since 3 of those players are making $450K and one is making $375K – is an actual Cap savings of just under $17M ($16.875M).

In addition, because of the releases of McGahee and Gregg, the team will have to carry $4.539M in dead money against the 2012 Cap.  There are no future Cap implications for Heap or Mason because they were in the final years of their deals.

2.       Teams Can Borrow Against Future Caps:

One new wrinkle added into the new CBA as part of the Transition Rules is a provision that allows teams to borrow up to $3M against future Salary Caps.  Basically, teams can designated up to 3 veterans, who have at least 5 seasons of accrued service time, and receive a $1M rebate on each of those players’ salaries for 2011.  If a team exercises this option, the amount borrowed will be deducted $1M each from the 2014-2016 Salary Caps. 

Given their tight Cap situation, look for the Ravens to take advantage of this option.

Teams will also have the option to borrow an additional $1.5M in 2012.

3.      Prohibition Against Renegotiating Rookie Deal:

One of the criticisms often leveled at Ozzie Newsome is that he waits too long to renegotiate and extend player’s contracts.  Now, the new CBA has pretty much removed that as a future criticism of the Ravens’ GM (joking).  One of the terms that the NFL owners fought for during the CBA negotiations was a provision to keep players still under their rookie contract from holding out or seeking a new deal.  The new provision prohibits players from seeking a renegotiation of their contracts until after they have completed their 3rd season.    

4.       Rookie Cap 

Various media reports indicate that the Ravens have a rookie Cap number (now called the “Year-One Rookie Allocation”) of $4.578M.  This is the maximum amount the team can allocate to the team’s rookies, including the undrafted free agents.  Since the Ravens have 8 draft picks, this means the 2011 Cap numbers for the 8 draft picks and any signing bonus prorations for the undrafted rookies signed by the team, must fit in under that number. 

However, the rookie Cap does not have a dollar-for-dollar impact on the team’s overall Salary Cap.  This is because of the Rule of 51 (as explained above) and the fact that most rookie contracts will contain a first year salary of the rookie minimum of $375K.  Presently (after the releases of the aforementioned 4 veterans), the bottom 8 salaries under the Rule of 51 all are making either $375K or more.  That means the $375K base salaries of the 8 rookies – a total of $3M – will not have any impact on the team’s overall Cap.  Because of this, only the bonus prorations for the draft picks and UDFAs will actually count against the team’s overall Cap.  So, of the $4.578M, the team will actually only need $1.578M in overall Cap space to sign its rookies.

Once the season starts, the full Cap number of all of the rookies who make the team will count against the Cap, but since those Cap numbers are lower than that of most veterans, the rookies will essentially be replacing a higher Cap number with their lower one.

5.      Present Cap space:

When many fans heard that the Ravens had created $18.6M by releasing the 4 veterans on Monday, visions of a huge Free Agent signing immediately started to abound.  However, much of that $18.6M was needed just to cover the players still on the team’s roster.  About a week ago, ESPN’s John Clayton reported that the Ravens were $1.8M over the Cap, but that number did not include the tenders for the team’s 8 RFAs (Jameel McClain, Oniel Cousins, Tavares Gooden, Haruki Nakamura, Jalen Parmele, Marcus Smith, Kelly Talavou and Tom Zibikowski).  Those RFA tenders amount to over $10M. 

In addition, the new CBA increased the minimum salaries at all levels by $55K.  About three-quarters of the players on the team have a base salary that is the league minimum for that player’s term of service.  While all of those don’t count amongst the top 51 Cap numbers, it still took away another $1.4M or so of the team’s Cap space.

So, based on the numbers Ravens24x7 has compiled detailed in this spreadsheet, the Ravens are approximately $7.5M under the 2011 Salary Cap of $120.375M for the moment.

This number does not yet include the contract of Marshal Yanda, since the exact details of his deal have yet to be disclosed.  His first year Cap number will likely be relatively low – in the $3-4M range – but that is still going to eat up a large amount of the available Cap space.

Also, as explained above, the team will also need to maintain a cushion of $1.578M for their rookie allocation.

In order to create some additional Cap space, the team will likely take advantage of the $3M “advance”, which will help, but the team is still pretty much tapped out at this point.

So, when people question why the Ravens have appeared to be so inactive, it’s pretty much because they have to be at this time. 

And as has been said in this space several times recently, getting DT Haloti Ngata signed to a contract extension and reducing his $12.476M Cap number (or restructuring some other deals) is imperative to allowing them some very needed Salary Cap flexibility.

 

20 Raves on “2011 SALARY CAP UPDATE: Why the Ravens aren’t active in free agency

  1. mike thompson on said:

    couldn’t have you just ask heap,gregg to take a salary cut of 1 or 1.5 million dollars for the reason im saying is heap and gregg are a big part of are suesses in the nfl i would love for us to keep them 2 valabel players on are team at least if not to be a player maybe as a couches assastence couse they can teach the young guys more about their postion and the game thank you for your time to read this and hope to hear back thank you your fan mike thompson

  2. TimTheEnchanter on said:

    Isn’t there some sort of $3m “exception” for veterans this year in addition to the 3m that can be borrowed? I thought I read the cap this year was ~$126M for teams that wanted to take advantage of all of these mechanisms.

    That still doesn’t give a ton of room to maneuver, but it wouldn’t be quite as dire as you’re making it sound.

  3. TimTheEnchanter on said:

    By the way… great stuff!

    Where do you get your numbers for the spreadsheet? Is it possible they are incorrect or out of date for some players?

    (Also, with the spreadsheet it would be even better for us numbers geeks if you could show the base salary/bonus proration split in addition to the total cap # so we know what the impact of various moves would be)

  4. ravcolt on said:

    Spot on as usual Brian. Look for the local media to pounce on your work without giving you credit. Hey, it’s that time of year – finally!

  5. Tony Lombardi on said:

    Tim,

    Your question is answered in No. 2 above. And as for Brian’s accuracy, his spreadsheet is an accumulation of several years of work, following player contracts as they mature. Brian may want to add to this but suffice it to say, if Pat Moriarty decides to retire in Florida, the Ravens might hire Brian.

  6. TimTheEnchanter on said:

    Tony,

    Thanks for the response… my point was that I thought there were TWO exceptions this year. one that was ~3m free and clear, and another that was ~3m borrowed against the future as described in #2 above.

    There was a lot of conflicting info as the deal was being finalized, so maybe that wasn’t part of the final deal?

  7. Jeremy gold on said:

    I don’t buy this garbage for one second. how can every other team be signing players but we are stuggling. This is nonsense and its biz as usual for ozzie newsome. name one big free agent he has signed since sharpe. He does not do well on the open market, and does not do well with time constraints ( see exhibit A the draft. has that ever happened to anybody before). He also does not work well under pressure( see exhibit B when he refused to pull the trigger for marshall faulk for a second rounder pick. HA). Its time for a new front office, and a new coach who the players don’t hate! ask around the league. harbaugh is despised. tell me this. How can the steelers have all their players resigned? how do the pats have money available? its a joke to think they dont. The jets were in the worst sitation starting this offseason, being well over the cap. but they have money for the top FA?

  8. Brian McFarland on said:

    Mike – They could have asked those guys to take a paycut – and they may have – but usually players want to see what’s possibly out there for them so that they can gauge what their value is before agreeing to accept a lesser amount. It’s a fair way of handling it for both parties.

  9. Brian McFarland on said:

    Tim – The $3.5M was mentioned in the early media reports, but it’s not contained in the official Transition Rules. Those rules do include an explanation of the $3M that can be borrowed, but nothing about the $3.5M. I’ve been told by a pretty reliable source that they $3.5M is already included in the $120M cap and that the cap would have really been more like $117M. I’m trying to verify that from other sources.

    As far as the accuracy goes, I can only say that I do my best with tracking this stuff and verifying my info. Unfortunately, the local media is not real good about reporting a lot of the details, so I can only go with what I can get. Anytime there are reports of cap space, I try to reconcile the numbers as best I can. I do think they are pretty accurate, but sometimes with things like incentives – earned and not earned – that it’s hard to know when or if they count. So, I’d say my numbers are at most off by $1M and I’d think it’s substantially less than that.

  10. Brian McFarland on said:

    Jeremy – Can you name any big name FAs that Steelers, Pats or Colts have ever signed?

    Have any of those 3 signed any big name FAs so far this year?

    The Jets are doing it by restructuring almost every big contract they have to make the room. The Ravens could do that too, but that way hasn’t always proven the best because it can continually put you in salary cap jail – think about what the Skins, Cowboys and Raiders have done over the last decade or so. The releases of McGahee and Gregg is already going to cost them close to $5M in cap space next year, so further use of that “credit card” (so to speak) isn’t apparently something they want to do at this point.

    But, yes, it is an option that is available to them.

  11. Jeff on said:

    I guess I’m just confused on this whole restructuring thing that the Jets seem to be doing for all of their high value players. Is it just restructuring in what years’ the payments occur (i.e. was supposed to be $5M this year, but restructured to be only $3M and the other $2M spread out over future years?). Wouldn’t this eventually come back to bite the team in the rear in future years? Or do you just continually restructure and restructure. I guess the Jets are taking a win now approach and don’t care too much about the future?

  12. Bob on said:

    So, we’ve cut Divens today. As we know from the cuts on the bigger names (such as McGehee, etc.) the total salary line doesn’t clear on cuts. Any idea how much “dead money” is left around when a guy like Divens gets cut? I would think we are going to see several player in his pay range get the ax along the way.

  13. Jeremy Gold on said:

    Brian-the steelers have had enough money to sign multiple of their own free agents including ike taylor. plaxico is visiting them tommorow. The eagles had enough for babin and namdi this week.

    OH and to answer your stupid question. How about when the pats signed adalius thomas from us because we couldnt afford him. Does that count? (Regardless of whether or not it was a good or bad contract.)

  14. Jeremy Gold on said:

    Oh , and one more thing to point out how poorly our cap is managed( besides foxworth’s contract which is enough itself to prove my point). How can we have trouble when we havent had a high draft pick draining out funds like other teams have had? for goodness sake we didnt even have a first round pick last yr. Ozzie is asleep at the wheel, and decosta is slumbering too. It reminds me of the scene from planes, trains, & automobiles.

  15. Jeremy Gold on said:

    Again proving how slow ozzie is. Peyton signed today for 90 million, and we have not been able to get haloti’s deal finished yet, even though we know it would gives us flexibility to get better as a team and maybe not melt like ice cream on a hot summer day when we see a colts or steelers jersey in the nfl playoffs.

  16. Brian on said:

    Jeff – Yes, that is correct. Generally, when a player’s contract is restructured his present base salary is turned into a bonus and that allows the team to spread that amount out over the remaining years of the contract.

    It’s a way to create space now, at the expense of future cap space. It can certainly bite teams later, but at least they do know it’s coming and can play around it (hopefully). The Jets appear to be doing wholesale restructures, so, yes, that could be a real problem in the future.

  17. Brian on said:

    Bob – Yes, Divens (now re-signed), Marcus Smith and Parmele all essentially agreed to reduce their base salaries from the RFA tender amount down to the veteran minimum for 4th year players. The team saved about $1.8M with those transactions.

  18. Brian on said:

    Jeremy – Thanks for answering my stupid question. The point was that those teams rarely ever make any major FA moves. In fact, other than re-signing their own, they are all relatively inactive most offseasons. The Ravens, on the other hand, have actually been more active, whether it’s signing Mason, Rolle, or Pryce, or trading for McGahee, McNair or Boldin. All of those moves were early in the FA period.

    Regardless, there are certainly valid criticisms of Ozzie (McGahee’s contract, Foxworth, ignoring the OL for so long, WR issues, etc), I just don’t think that not jumping on every big-named FA is one of them.

  19. TimTheEnchanter on said:

    Thanks Brian. I’ve been trying to follow the transactions and update the spreadsheet as it goes along, but without details on Yanda, Carr (don’t even know total, let alone breakdown), and Leach contracts it’s just guesswork.

    Question: do divens smith and parmele all qualify for the vet minimum cap exception?

    Keep up the good work!

  20. Brian on said:

    Tim – No, they do not. To qualify for the Minimum Salary Benefit, they must have 4+ years of experience. All of those guys only have 3 years of service time.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Hot off the street

Ravens fans can relate to the Aaron Hernandez case

In 2000, Baltimore Ravens fans were devastated and worried at the same time. Future Hall-of-Fame Linebacker Ray Lewis was accused of double murder outside an Atlanta nightclub. He was hanging aroun...read more

For fired radio hosts, punishment doesn’t fit crime

Unless you're a fan of the Pittsburgh Steelers, you'll usually have a hard time offending me. However, I was pretty taken aback on Monday as news broke from the actions of three Atlanta-based radio ho...read more

Castillo makes Ravens O-line higher tech

Juan Castillo has a bureaucratic kind of title for a football coach: run game coordinator. But to the Ravens offensive linemen who hear from him at each practice, he’s no bureaucrat. “His passi...read more

“Little” Ray ready to help fill leadership shoes left by “Big” Ray

When linebacker Ray Lewis retired following the Super Bowl XLVII, the Ravens didn’t just lose one of the greatest linebackers to every play the game, they also lost arguably the greatest team leader...read more

A fresh secondary in Baltimore

The Ravens Secondary has changed with the departures of Ed Reed and a few others, but the goal is still the same: shut (or at least slow) down the opponent’s passing game. Remember a few months a...read more

View More