PSL Source Baltimore Ravens PSLs
Cap Ramifications Of Ray Rice’s Legal Issues

Salary Cap Cap Ramifications Of Ray Rice’s Legal Issues

Posted in Salary Cap
11+ Comments Mike Hense says what are your opinions on the NHL... U.S. Soccer... i think you know all too well why i ask... --Mike
Print this article

As more and more details come out about the “altercation” between Ray Rice and his fiancée in Atlantic City, it starts looking worse and worse for Rice.

Clearly, whatever happened has damaged his “good guy” reputation in the court of public opinion – perhaps forever – and has caught the eye of the NFL offices in New York. It’s a situation that can’t make the Ravens Front Office very happy either and they are probably in major damage control mode at this point.

It has also driven fans to question whether the Ravens should release Rice and what the implications of such a move would cause.

So first, the numbers:

Rice has 3 years left on the 5-year, $35M contract he signed in 2012. His Cap number for 2014 is $8.75M, which includes his $4M base salary and the $4.75M proration from his 2012 Signing Bonus and his 2013 Option Bonus.

The key number for this discussion, though, is the $14.25M in bonus prorations for those final 3 years of his contract. When a player is no longer on the team, this amount that still counts against the team’s Cap is what is known as “dead money”.

So, let’s run those numbers out.

If the Ravens decided to release Rice, they would be relieved of having to pay his base salaries, which would also no longer count against the Cap. However the team WOULD have to account for that $14.25M in dead money – money that has already been paid to Rice, but has yet to count against the Cap.

If Rice is released prior to June 1st, all of that $14.25M will count immediately against the 2014 Cap. Since Rice is presently set to count $8.75M against the Cap, his release would cause an additional $5.5M to count against the Cap. That’s $5.5M more than he presently counts. To put that into perspective, the $4.6M in Cap space that was just created by the contract extension for Terrell Suggs would be gone.

On the other hand, in order to lessen the impact of the entire $14.25M hitting all at once in 2014, the Ravens could instead release Rice after June 1st (or prior, by using one of their two June 1 exemptions). However, a post-June 1 release will cause dead money – a lot of it – to hit in 2015. With a post-June 1 release, the Ravens only have to count this year’s bonus proration of $4.75M against the Cap in 2014, but the remaining $9.5M would then hit against the 2015 Cap.

Needless to say, neither option is particularly palatable.

So far, the Ravens have been very clear that Rice is going to be a Raven next season. Perhaps, if more and more negative information comes out, they may be forced to reevaluate that stance, but as of now, it appears that Rice will not be released.

Still, another issue of great discussion – most notably on the radio and message boards – is the possibility of voiding Rice’s contract and recouping the bonus money already paid to Rice. Given that Rice looked like a shell of his former self in 2013, some wonder if this incident could give the team a chance to get out from underneath of the contract that Rice isn’t exactly earning.

The term “morality clause” has become a major talking point – but without any real context.

The morality clause, contained in Paragraph 11 of the standard NFL contract, simply allows teams to release players for “skill, performance and conduct”. The morality clause, however, does not allow a team to recoup any Bonus money paid (much less his entire bonus).

Of course, the team and, more importantly, the Commissioner do have the ability to suspend a player. If a player is suspended, the team does get a rebate – in cash and Cap – in the amount of the total of the game checks lost by the player during the suspension. Obviously, assuming any suspension for Rice would only be for a couple of games at most, that’s not likely to be a major amount in this situation.

What the CBA does allow is for the team to recoup a portion (notice – a “portion”) of a player’s bonus money when the player commits a “forfeitable breach” by being unavailable to play for his team. Under Article 4, Section 9 of the CBA, unavailability basically comes down to a player retiring early, a holdout, a suspension or incarceration.

However, simply being released by his team before being arrested for a crime does not make a player “unavailable” pursuant to the terms of the CBA. So, the player must be on the team’s roster if and when the player is actually unable to perform due to a “forfeitable breach”.

That obviously shoots down the theory of using the “morality clause”.

At this point, missing time due to incarceration seems unlikely, but a suspension by the league would appear much more likely. In that case, a forfeitable breach would occur.

So, not only would the team receive a Cap rebate of the salary lost by the player, but would also receive a credit for the bonus forfeiture.

If a forfeitable breach occurs, the team can only recover a proportionate amount of bonus money, based on the amount of time the player is actually unavailable.

In Rice’s case, a suspension would cost him $235,294 per game from his base salary of $4M and the team would get a Cap credit in that amount. The amount of any corresponding bonus forfeiture would depend on the length of the suspension.

If the suspension is for 1-4 games, the CBA says “the player may be required to forfeit up to twenty-five percent (25%) of his Forfeitable Salary Allocations upon missing his first regular season game”. Pursuant to the CBA, the “Forfeitable Salary Allocation” applies only to Signing Bonus prorations, and not Option Bonus prorations.

So how does this pertain to Rice?

In the event of such a suspension, the Ravens could receive a bonus forfeiture of $750K (25% of his $3M 2014 Signing Bonus proration) assuming Rice is forced to miss 4 games or less.

It is important to note that bonus forfeiture is completely at the discretion of the team and not automatic. So, whether the Ravens were to pursue recouping some of Rice’s bonus would entirely be up to them, but they have done so with lesser players and lesser offenses in the past.

Regardless, any hopes of voiding Rice’s contract in an effort to escape his contract and recoup millions of dollars is totally misplaced.

As of now, though, it’s wait and see for the Ravens.

They appear unlikely to release Rice, so they will have to wait and let the judicial system and the Commissioner’s office decide Rice’s fate before the team can decide if it wants to take more money away from Rice.

Share This  
Brian McFarland

About Brian McFarland

Known on Ravens Message Boards as "B-more Ravor", Brian is a life-long Baltimorean and an avid fan of the Ravens and all Baltimore sports.  A PSL holder since 1998, Brian has garnered a reputation as a cap-guru because of his strange (actually warped) desire to wade through the intricacies of the NFL's salary cap and actually make sense of it for those of us who view it as inviting as IRS Tax Code.      Brian, who hails from Catonsville, MD and still resides there, is married and has two children. More from Brian McFarland
Ryan o
Ryan o

The team should not be handicapped because of his actions. This is more of an nfl issue than a ravens issue. The 49ers and panthers wouldent be punished the way the ravens would be all because Ray was caught on film.


This isn't about the cap hit the Ravens will take. Let me make this clear, if the evidence (more video's) come to light that Ray Rice really did knock the mother of his child out in public, he can't be on this team. It's that simple. If he punched her and knocked her out cold and dragged her like that out of an elevator, he simply can't be on the team, especially if video evidence were to appear to support this. We'd be in unchartered territory because of the video of the incident. All the normal Domestic Violence stuff takes place behind closed doors, but if the entire world were to see him knock her out on video, game over. I am a DIE HARD Ravens fan, eat sleep and breathe it during the season. But if it turns out he did this and they keep him on the team because it would be a "Cap Hit" not to, I will never watch another Ravens game in my life. I'm not some bleeding heart either, I'm a conservative male but the idea of cheering for a team with him on it would literally make me sick to my stomach....again if it does turn out to be a fact that he knocked her unconscious. No way he stays, Bisciotti is too smart and knows what kind of REAL HIT this franchise would take if they kept him. Fans would understand we'd be handicapped on the field for a few years because of it and wouldn't blame them if they weren't as good. But there's no way most fans could accept keeping him on the roster.


How much dead money would the Ravens have if they cut Ray after the 2014 season?


The real thug comes out of Ray, thought he was better then that. Plus his fat butt couldn't even run two yards before he just laid down this past season, time for him to go! Maybe ray and big Ben could go hang out. Ray could knock them out and big Ben would rape her. That's the state of the NFL in 2014, no better then the NBA, what a disgrace.


Just another great article on the cap situation, always enjoy reading them, Brian.


What would be the cost for a trade? Does the new team take full contract?

Voice of Reason
Voice of Reason

Unfortunately with RR's contract, so much of it is tied up in bonuses, so cutting him wouldn't really help much. In this case a suspension would help the cap a lot. And, being a RB it could help keep him fresh too.

T Ham
T Ham

Brian. I don't understand the cap at all, so I really appreciate your breaking this down. Thank you for your thourough article.

Mike Hense
Mike Hense

what are your opinions on the NHL... U.S. Soccer... i think you know all too well why i ask... --Mike

Brian McFarland
Brian McFarland

Joe - For Cap purposes, a trade is treated the same way as a release. So, the pre-June 1 and post-June 1 numbers would be exactly the same.


Your browser is out-of-date!

Update your browser to view this website correctly.

Get More Information