Proud Partner Of

The Battle For Backup QB

Street Talk The Battle For Backup QB

Posted in Street Talk
8+ Comments JUANCUBA says To make that comment must mean you can ball yourself. I doubt though, so your just another keyboard QB. E.A.D!!!

After the writing was scripted on the wall leading up to the draft with head coach John Harbaugh’s intention to add competition for the backup quarterback position well-documented, the Baltimore Ravens took action when they selected Ball State quarterback Keith Wenning in the sixth round.

With Tyrod Taylor set to become a free agent after the 2014 season and Baltimore’s urge to upgrade the backup quarterback situation, addressing the problem now instead of next year gives Baltimore a head start on the process.

While Taylor is still under contract with the team for the season and has three years of experience in Baltimore including appearances in 13 games (albeit in extremely limited fashion), is his job safe?

Let’s address some of the scenarios the Ravens could implement with the Wenning-Tyrod dilemma and determine the validity.

THE RAVENS CAN CARRY THREE QUARTERBACKS

This is the instant reaction for many; let Wenning and Taylor both play for the team this season, have Wenning play behind Taylor on the depth chart and allow Taylor to sign elsewhere next season, opening up the backup spot for Wenning.

There are two problems with this scenario.

First, the Ravens have only carried two quarterbacks on the active roster in recent years. In the three years Taylor has been with the Ravens, he has been the team’s only backup, with the Joe Flacco-Taylor duo being the only one in Baltimore since Taylor entered the NFL.

With only 53 roster spots and 46 active players on game day, every player counts, and keeping three quarterbacks is a waste of a roster spot. The Ravens will never need three quarterbacks in a single game, and odds are if three are carried on the active roster, only two will actually be active on game day, preventing either Taylor or Wenning from even suiting up every week.

Carrying three quarterbacks only weakens a roster; that roster spot would be much more valuable for an extra defensive back or offensive lineman.

The second problem is that, well, Wenning is simply a better quarterback.

Taylor has his fair share of fans in Baltimore, but in three years, his on-field cameos have been more in the form of gimmicks than displays of true NFL passing talent. He’s essentially the same passer that he was when he entered the NFL, and he has made it to this point because of his exceptional athleticism.

Wenning enters the NFL as a seasoned college veteran (49 career games, 47 starts), whose passing ability is equal to or better than Taylor’s at every level of the field. He’s among the most accurate passers from his rookie class, and displayed the arm talent to make every throw at Ball State, with limited arm strength overall.

As an athlete, he may be maxed out and his arm strength likely won’t vastly improve in the pros, but even at that, the passer that Wenning is right now is one that is capable enough of being a backup in the NFL.

He also joins the team with an early vote of confidence from the coaching staff, as assistant GM Eric DeCosta noted at a post-draft Q&A that Wenning was the only quarterback in this year’s draft to receive a consensus positive opinion from every decision maker in Baltimore’s draft process.

KEEP JUST ONE, AND MAKE IT WHOEVER HAS THE BETTER PRESEASON

In a perfect world, maybe. If NFL rules allowed rookies to be simply demoted to the practice squad without any conflict, then Wenning could spend part or all of his rookie campaign on the practice squad, let Taylor be the backup for one more year, then take over the job in 2015.

But with the waiver process getting in the way of retaining quality players, if Wenning were to be outplayed by Taylor in training camp and the preseason, it’s highly unlikely Wenning would make it back to Baltimore to join the practice squad if released. Teams that carry three quarterbacks or organizations with lackluster situations at the position would salivate over the opportunity to add a rookie of Wenning’s caliber as a developmental option.

Obviously, though, with Wenning under contract for four years and Taylor on the books for one more year, Baltimore’s coaching staff wouldn’t be pulling any hairs if Wenning overmatches Taylor before final cuts and the idea of Taylor being released is explored.

CUT TAYLOR, LET WENNING BE THE BACKUP IN 2014

This is the most ideal scenario. As mentioned above, at least from this perspective, Wenning is a superior quarterback to Taylor right now, even without having played a single down in the NFL. That alone gives him the leg up en route to winning the backup quarterback job.

Keeping Taylor is just delaying the inevitable, which is Wenning being the backup quarterback in Baltimore. At the latest, he’ll be Flacco’s counterpart at the start of the 2015 season, but since there’s a good chance that’ll happen, why not just get a head start and do it now?

Those concerned with Wenning’s on-field ability as a rookie should take note of two things: Flacco has never missed a play due to injury in six NFL seasons and Taylor was the team’s backup as a rookie in 2011. If the Ravens were confident enough in a rookie Tyrod Taylor potentially having to play in the 2011 AFC Championship Game in New England, there’s absolutely no doubt that Wenning can gain the same vote of confidence from the coaching staff.

If Flacco suffers a season-ending injury, Baltimore’s season is already on life support anyway, regardless of the backup. Smart teams live and die by their starting quarterback, directing little attention to the rest of the quarterback depth chart, and that’s the route Baltimore has opted to take in recent years.

Tyrod has his clique of supporters in Baltimore, but if you’re in looking forward to this training camp competition, don’t hesitate to join me in the Wenning circle.

Who do you think will win the Ravens backup QB job?
Share This  
Kyle Casey

About Kyle Casey

Kyle's love of pro and college football stems from his passion for the Baltimore Ravens. He has held season tickets in section 542 of M&T Bank Stadium since 2004. He is a junior Mass Communications student originally attending Towson University but currently on a year-long exchange at the University of New Mexico. More from Kyle Casey
8 comments
Chris
Chris

If we can get the oline to play anything above the worst oline in the league like last year, this article won't matter. Flacco kept us in every game almost by himself. Without him we go 4 wins tops last year. Same thing will happen this year, it doesnt matter who our backup is, we will not win without flacco leading the ship

Mista T
Mista T

3 QBs makes more sense this season. Flacco's six season iron-man stint is in jepoardy due to his age and the many hits he has taken. The 2013 playoffs may have been lost by not having a quality backup QB able to step in after Flacco took a hit in Detroit.

Cheri
Cheri

I also don't think you can rule out one of the Houston QB's whether it's Keenum or Yates being in the mix.

Bobby S.
Bobby S.

Spoiler alert: They both suck.

omar804
omar804

i can see wenning winning the backup QB job outright , i think he will beat tyrod, wenning can throw way better the tyrod, and he might end up being the GEM of this draft.

Voice of Reason
Voice of Reason

A very well written article. This is exactly what will happen, because the Ravens now realize the backup QB has to mirror the starting QB in style and in talent, otherwise you have to design (2) different offenses because the running style QB brings different skill sets to the game. When the Ravens were experimenting with the Wildcat offense, Tyrod was the ideal person to have as QB. However, that has become nothing more than occasional trickery and most teams know how to defend it. I think the Ravens would be wise and kind to release Tyrod early so that he can catch on with another team.

lobachevsky
lobachevsky

Even the best OL in the league occasionally gets beaten by the pass rush--& it only takes one fluke hit to end a QB's season no matter how tough he is. The issue is which backup is better suited to take over in that (one hopes) unlikely but dire situation. Kubiak's run-heavy zone-blocking offense requires a smart signal caller who can consistently make enough throws to burn the D if it loads up the box. That describes Wenning far better than Tyrod--he may not have Joe's howitzer but he looks at least as sharp & efficient as a young Matt Schaub, which is all Kubes would need to keep the team in games.

JUANCUBA
JUANCUBA

To make that comment must mean you can ball yourself. I doubt though, so your just another keyboard QB. E.A.D!!!

Close

Your browser is out-of-date!

Update your browser to view this website correctly.

Get More Information