Obamites try to squelch critic

[sailorsam]

newswriter Stanley Kurtz has been doing research on Obama and Bill Ayers; he was invited to appear on a Chicago talk (radio) show the other day. The Obama campaign (who declined to send a rep to the show) sent out emails to supporters to call/email the show and criticize Kurtz and the host.
meanwhile, an ABC reporter taking pix of democratic senators meeting at a hotel with lobbyists was arrested by the cops.
heard either of these stories on the established media? not. imagine what these people would do with the power of the executive branch behind them.

[Galen Sevinne]

newswriter Stanley Kurtz has been doing research on Obama and Bill Ayers; he was invited to appear on a Chicago talk (radio) show the other day. The Obama campaign (who declined to send a rep to the show) sent out emails to supporters to call/email the show and criticize Kurtz and the host.
meanwhile, an ABC reporter taking pix of democratic senators meeting at a hotel with lobbyists was arrested by the cops.
heard either of these stories on the established media? not. imagine what these people would do with the power of the executive branch behind them.

Don't forget that he also has a funny name and he is black!

[sailorsam]

(in response to Trap)
in their heart of hearts, they think dictatorships like Cuba and China are somehow 'good'. these idiots don't realize if the US went like that they'd be the first ones thrown in the gulag.

[sailorsam]

Don't forget that he also has a funny name and he is black!

if these folks want to debate issues, bring it on, but they want to intimidate into silence those who disagree. Like the author (Corsi?) last week had a book investigating Obama's past; normally, if questions are raised about a politician's background, others in the media send investigators to verify; instead the media sent people to research, not Obama, not the allegagions, but the author. Not suprisingly we got lots of smears and name-calling, but not much in the way of corrections or the pointing out of specific errors.
the quoted response, for example, doesn't dispute the story, and doesn't address the concerns that a powerful politician/party would try to suppress free speach; just a flippant dismissal.
Do we see no problem about people with this mindset/philosophy having the FBI working for them?

[Galen Sevinne]

if these folks want to debate issues, bring it on, but they want to intimidate into silence those who disagree. Like the author (Corsi?) last week had a book investigating Obama's past; normally, if questions are raised about a politician's background, others in the media send investigators to verify; instead the media sent people to research, not Obama, not the allegagions, but the author. Not suprisingly we got lots of smears and name-calling, but not much in the way of corrections or the pointing out of specific errors.
the quoted response, for example, doesn't dispute the story, and doesn't address the concerns that a powerful politician/party would try to suppress free speach; just a flippant dismissal.
Do we see no problem about people with this mindset/philosophy having the FBI working for them?

Corsi??? Dude you are further behind the republican "smear curve" than Trap.

You should be pushing the issues of greek columns now so that when Obama talks before 80,000 paying people it doesn't make Mccain look bad tomorrow when he has less than 5,000 show up for his free VP announcement.

[sailorsam]

Corsi??? Dude you are further behind the republican "smear curve" than Trap.

You should be pushing the issues of greek columns now so that when Obama talks before 80,000 paying people it doesn't make Mccain look bad tomorrow when he has less than 5,000 show up for his free VP announcement.

Corsi criticized Obama. The reaction:

_ number of factual errors by Corsi sited

_ connections between Corsi and GOP organizations

_ attempts made by the establishment media to coroborate Corsi

X name calling (he's a smear artist!!!)

:ref:

[Galen Sevinne]

Um, excuse me Len, but CBS NEWS, that great liberal network in the sky did some Greek column smearing itself. You obviously missed the link so here it is again.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=5660266

Looks like we got 5 libs vs 2 conservatives in here now.

TRAP and SAM for the conserves

GALEN, FRED AND HOUSTON for the libs and yes, Houston Raven is a liberal.


:laugh:

Galen + Fred + Houston = 5???

C'mon at least get your elementary addition correct. I understand why your politics are so misguided but 1+1+1 = 3 is really unacceptable.

[jonboy79]

I think he meant that G7 is triple the fun.... He is triple the liberal, that much is for sure... There are plenty more conservatives in hiding here as well, it's just there hasn't been all that much to talk about...

[Galen Sevinne]

OK, OK, CORRECTION:

I meant 5 guys in here = 3 LIBs vs 2 CONSERVES.

As your gal Hilly would say: SO WHAT?!!

I should have used spell check.

:insane:

You're so frivilous.

ahhh :229031_confused2: ...not to be "frivilous" but spell check doesn't really check calculation errors.

Check this out Trap. You thought 1+1+1 = 5 and you thought that spell check would have corrected that...since we have established beyond a shadow of a doubt that you can be so wrong could it be also that your politics are as wrong and you just don't know it yet? :iagree:

[HoustonRaven]

And once again, Trap makes our side look bad by resorting to name calling yet again.

I need to keep him on ignore if I know whats good for me.

[Rochardrik]

haha ha ha - You keep taking me off ignore Al.


Yea I'm making your side look bad, you're on the liberal side.

You got guys saying you dissed them off in the football forum as well.

You started it.

And you wonder why no one shows up to drink with you when you come to town and you beg everyone for a social. LOL.

You obviously don't have any friends in your old neighborhood to hang out with or else you wouldn't be asking complete strangers to drink with you. Of course your old friends don't like you either. No wonder you left town.


Another hi-jacked thread by the libs. They can't score on points. ha ha ha ha


:141847_bdmoon: Ahem... This is just abysmal. The depths of this posters immaturity is unfathomable! . If this is an "example" of conservatism, it shows why liberal thinking is so much more advanced.

[Rochardrik]

The hi-jacking by the libs continue

Brilliant!

[sailorsam]

wow, so much commentary on the Obama campaign's attempting squelching of free speech (the beautiful Michelle Malkin has mentioned it in her column).