View Full Version : illegal contact on Pitta?
OriAl
01-22-2012, 07:19 PM
Those of you re-watching the game ending plays on DVR (I'm not) - should there have been a flag for illegal contact on Pitta (I think it was) on third down?
micadrz400
01-22-2012, 07:22 PM
Pretty bad no call by the zebra's.
Raveninwoodlawn
01-22-2012, 07:22 PM
No.
Stop grasping at straws people...
MattSG
01-22-2012, 07:30 PM
That was a bad no call. The defender had a handful of jersey. The Lee Evans play was correct though.
RavensRule2
01-22-2012, 07:35 PM
Those of you re-watching the game ending plays on DVR (I'm not) - should there have been a flag for illegal contact on Pitta (I think it was) on third down?
Why are you torturing yourself? It's over. You can make a case for a flag on every play, can you?
RockyMRaven
01-22-2012, 07:44 PM
Those of you re-watching the game ending plays on DVR (I'm not) - should there have been a flag for illegal contact on Pitta (I think it was) on third down?
I don't have to re-watch it. I was yelling at the TV at the time "Why was that not defensive holding?" It was a terrible no-call.
Jeremiah W
01-22-2012, 07:51 PM
It looked bad, but Joe was outside the pocket so it may be legal to mug there.
On the other hand, Vernon Davis is a beast who can not be covered by mere mortals. We need a guy like that. Maybe a big fast Wr but some better redzone passing targets would be nice.
Ravenswintitle
01-22-2012, 07:53 PM
They actually let them play quite a bit today. Saw a lot of post play shoving with no flags.
lovefootball
01-22-2012, 08:07 PM
Home field advantage won the game for the pats, it sure wasn't on the passing of the great brady. Would have like to see T Smith make that catch on the long pass by Flacco.