Game Thread: Wildcard Weekend: vs Indianapolis

**Ravenswintitle** · 01-06-2013, 03:22 PM

That was a nice touch

**bmoreravengirl** · 01-06-2013, 03:22 PM

Thanks you guys.

This calls for a drink.

**ctulb** · 01-06-2013, 03:24 PM

Originally Posted by bmoreravengirl

Thanks you guys.

This calls for a drink.

Only one??

Bring on next week!

**Tyrian** · 01-06-2013, 03:27 PM

Our 11th playoff victory. 11 in 12 or 13 seasons.

Now equal with Cleveland. That's gotta hurt. Especially as their last one was in 1994.

**DarienA** · 01-06-2013, 03:28 PM

So I'm sitting here watching the game with my wife and her parents... and Ray Lewis is running around with Psalm 91 on his shirt... my mom in law says... what's that Pslam? and my father in law says "I can do all things in the 4th quarter" LOL

**bmoreravengirl** · 01-06-2013, 03:29 PM

Originally Posted by ctulb

Only one??

Just one for me, two the max.

Now if we go to the big dance then it's...

**Lee Van Cleef** · 01-06-2013, 03:32 PM

Even if the game was nervewracking for a long time, that was an awesome ending.

**MarkS** · 01-06-2013, 03:32 PM

Originally Posted by StingerNLG

It's still a bullshit call. I don't care what anyone says.

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2

You're close - the RULE is bullshit. Sadly, the call was correct.

**DrUnk** · 01-06-2013, 03:33 PM

Originally Posted by DarienA

So I'm sitting here watching the game with my wife and her parents... and Ray Lewis is running around with Psalm 91 on his shirt... my mom in law says... what's that Pslam? and my father in law says "I can do all things in the 4th quarter" LOL

I like the way he thinks.

**Irish Raven** · 01-06-2013, 03:34 PM

Originally Posted by bmoreravengirl

Just one for me, two the max.

Now if we go to the big dance then it's...

The Irishman says you can have as much Guinness as you want

**StingerNLG** · 01-06-2013, 03:35 PM

Originally Posted by MarkS

You're close - the RULE is bullshit. Sadly, the call was correct.

Sorry, but no one here will ever convince me that leading with the shoulder, hitting the receiver in the numbers, and having incidental helmet contact that is part initiated by the receiver is ever a good or correct call.

There is helmet-to-helmet hitting that should be called. This was not it.

**Arthorn** · 01-06-2013, 03:37 PM

Had to leave early to avoid train hell, but it was awesome seeing Ray on his last home game.

Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk 2

**Raveninwoodlawn** · 01-06-2013, 03:43 PM

Originally Posted by StingerNLG

Sorry, but no one here will ever convince me that leading with the shoulder, hitting the receiver in the numbers, and having incidental helmet contact that is part initiated by the receiver is ever a good or correct call.

There is helmet-to-helmet hitting that should be called. This was not it.

That's not the rule though.

You are basically saying the refs should not apply the rule as it was intended.

The rule does not allow for incedental, accidental, magical or whatever term you want to use, helmet to helmet contact.

If your helmet (or forearm, or shoulder or whatever) hits the other guys helmet, the rule is that a flag should be thrown.

And that is why you should be bitching at the RULE and not the call.

**Uli2001** · 01-06-2013, 03:52 PM

What this kind of BS is going to lead to is a lot of season-ending ACLs and leg injuries when defense players start going for the knees. Then I will have a good laugh as the NFL squirms their way through it. Ban all hits and turn it into flag football, that will do it.