Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 67
  1. #21

    Re: 2 Super Bowl Rings in 17 years



    Quote Originally Posted by TheOrioleWay View Post
    (with deep apologies to CincyCat, a class act bengals fan!):

    Living in Cincinnati, you really learn to appreciate what we have with our Ravens. Being landlocked here, I often have to defend my Ravens against some of their more outspoken (and drunk at tailgating) fans.

    This is quickly accomplished by mentioning that Reagan was president the last time they won a playoff game.

    Even more embarassing, Flacco in his 1st 4 years, earned more playoff wins than the entire Bengals franchise history. My Brother in Law was a huge Flacco basher and this helped to keep him in check.

    Five minutes after we hoisted the Lombardi, though, I received a text from him that simply said: "I was wrong about Flacco".

    Please share this with your Bro. in law

    http://www.youtube.com/v/ktDO_LtGSLM

    I think this applies to him as well as many other critics as it relates to what Joe would say to them.




  2. #22
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    871

    Re: 2 Super Bowl Rings in 17 years

    I'd be ecstatic with a long-run average anywhere close to a Super Bowl every 8.5 years. There are 32 teams in the NFL, so that's about 4x as many as the average franchise will see.

    I think we're witnessing an era of great Ravens football right now, and we should enjoy being around for the history that the organization is creating. There's no guarantee it will last forever, and if history is any indicator it won't. To Colts had a great ride during the Unitas years, but eventually the team faded and even moved. The Orioles had an incredible run of sustained winning, but organizations inevitably change, and since then they've become a sub-par organization.

    Looking at some of the greatest runs of success in NFL history, those teams eventually faded and sunk into periods of mediocrity. After winning 5 Super Bowls in a pretty condensed period, the 49ers only had 2 winning seasons from 1999-2010. The Cowboys have a great history of success, but they've been average since 1997. Even the Steelers were generally terrible before 1972 and very average from 1980-1991, and they've pretty much set the standard for sustained greatness in the Super Bowl era.

    And quite frankly the Ravens haven't accomplished anything on the level of those organizations yet.

    The Ravens are set up well with a young and highly competent owner and the FO is set up well with Ozzie. Hopefully DeCosta will step in and continue that. I think we're in an era of great Ravens football that could last a while longer. Enjoy it! Things inevitable change over time.
    "People against the abuse of dead horses and the idea of moving Lardarius Webb to safety"

    Founder: 3/26/2013


    To join, copy the title along with "Member: ##/##/####" into your sig line.



  3. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Perry Hall
    Posts
    2,668

    Re: 2 Super Bowl Rings in 17 years

    Quote Originally Posted by Sua Sponte View Post
    Well if we are going to count them, then Baltimore has 6 Championships. Just saying.

    58, 59, 68, 70, 2000, 2012
    Are you seriously counting 68 as a championship year? Sorry, choking to the freaking Jets in one of the biggest upsets in sports history is nothing to brag about and should not be counted as a Baltimore championship even if it was before the merger and technically we were "NFL champions".



  4. #24

    Re: 2 Super Bowl Rings in 17 years

    All I have to say is enjoy this run and really appreciate the effort our FO does to keep our team competitive. While I hope it doesn't happen if we don't make the playoffs next year just watch some our spoiled fanbase calling for John and Ozzie's head and asking for the roster to get blown up.



  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Roland Park
    Posts
    112

    Re: 2 Super Bowl Rings in 17 years

    Quote Originally Posted by Losac View Post
    Are you seriously counting 68 as a championship year? Sorry, choking to the freaking Jets in one of the biggest upsets in sports history is nothing to brag about and should not be counted as a Baltimore championship even if it was before the merger and technically we were "NFL champions".
    I go back and forth on this technicality. I would be interested in people's thoughts on our '68 "championship." Clearly the Jets were not the NFL champions that year, since they didn't play in the NFL. But it was a championship game, and we lost it, so how could we be champions? Did the NFL just not have a champion that year?

    The best analogy I can come up with is thinking about if the Ravens decided to play a game against the Toronto Argonauts after the Super Bowl, and lost it. Would we be champions? What if the NFL and CFL merged the following year?

    BTW, as an aside, I don't know that having the greatest QB in NFL history sidelined with injury for most of the game counts as 'choking.'



  6. #26

    Re: 2 Super Bowl Rings in 17 years

    This was up on the RSR facebook page yesterday. There were quite a few people on there saying how they didn't feel like 2 Super Bowls in 17 years was enough success to make them happy. This was my response:

    "There are some very childish, unrealistic knuckleheads posting here today. Two Super Bowl wins in 17 years not good enough? I'm sorry, but if you believe that you are advertising yourself as one of those embarrassing "fans" who knows nothing about the history of the NFL and how rare NFL titles truly are.

    Statistically speaking, any random NFL team should win a Super Bowl 3.13% of the time. The Ravens have won a Super Bowl in 11.76% of their seasons in the NFL. That's pretty darn impressive. During the last 17 years, only 11 teams have won even one super Bowl. Ravens are one of six franchises to win two. If you can't accept that type of success, then just give up on being a football fan altogether.

    The Browns and Lions have yet to even reach a Super Bowl in 47 years.

    Jaguars and Texans are still waiting for their first Super Bowl appearance as well. In fact, the Texans haven't even reached a conference final yet.

    It's been over 40 years since the Chiefs and Jets have even reached a Super Bowl. They both won an early Super Bowl and haven't even been back in the big game in four decades. There are a lot of Jets and KC fans in their 70s who were in their 30s the last time they played a Super Bowl. Still want to complain about prosperity now?

    The Vikings and the Bills and Eagles have been around since the start of the NFL/AFL merger and are still looking for their first win. They are a combined 0-10 in Super Bowls.

    The Titans/Oilers have had some great teams over the years, yet have ONE super bowl appearance (a loss). Seahawks have one appearance in their history (also a loss). Chargers fans have never tasted what a NFL championship feels like either.

    The Redskins and Cowboys, two of the biggest fan bases in the country, have gone a combined 38 years since APPEARING in a super Bowl. Still feel like two titles in 17 years isn't good enough?

    Raiders have been to 1 super bowl ( a loss) in the last 30 years. It's been 28 years since the Dolphins even appeared in a Super Bowl.

    Broncos have fielded a lot of very good teams over the last decade+ and still are now at 14 years and counting without a Super Bowl appearance.

    Smile, Ravens nation, and realize how blessed we are to have the type of success we've had"



  7. #27
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Perry Hall
    Posts
    2,668

    Re: 2 Super Bowl Rings in 17 years

    Quote Originally Posted by HotInHere View Post
    I go back and forth on this technicality. I would be interested in people's thoughts on our '68 "championship." Clearly the Jets were not the NFL champions that year, since they didn't play in the NFL. But it was a championship game, and we lost it, so how could we be champions? Did the NFL just not have a champion that year?

    The best analogy I can come up with is thinking about if the Ravens decided to play a game against the Toronto Argonauts after the Super Bowl, and lost it. Would we be champions? What if the NFL and CFL merged the following year?

    BTW, as an aside, I don't know that having the greatest QB in NFL history sidelined with injury for most of the game counts as 'choking.'
    The Colts were favored by 18 points going into the game. Earl Morrall had started the entire season and had a career year. Plus didn't Shula stick with Morrall during the season even when Unitas was technically able to return? They only put Unitas into the game in the second half as a desperation move. It's still considered probably the biggest upset in the history of pro football. I'd call that a choke.



  8. #28

    Re: 2 Super Bowl Rings in 17 years

    Quote Originally Posted by LukeDaniel View Post
    This was up on the RSR facebook page yesterday. There were quite a few people on there saying how they didn't feel like 2 Super Bowls in 17 years was enough success to make them happy. This was my response:

    "There are some very childish, unrealistic knuckleheads posting here today. Two Super Bowl wins in 17 years not good enough? I'm sorry, but if you believe that you are advertising yourself as one of those embarrassing "fans" who knows nothing about the history of the NFL and how rare NFL titles truly are.

    Statistically speaking, any random NFL team should win a Super Bowl 3.13% of the time. The Ravens have won a Super Bowl in 11.76% of their seasons in the NFL. That's pretty darn impressive. During the last 17 years, only 11 teams have won even one super Bowl. Ravens are one of six franchises to win two. If you can't accept that type of success, then just give up on being a football fan altogether.

    The Browns and Lions have yet to even reach a Super Bowl in 47 years.

    Jaguars and Texans are still waiting for their first Super Bowl appearance as well. In fact, the Texans haven't even reached a conference final yet.

    It's been over 40 years since the Chiefs and Jets have even reached a Super Bowl. They both won an early Super Bowl and haven't even been back in the big game in four decades. There are a lot of Jets and KC fans in their 70s who were in their 30s the last time they played a Super Bowl. Still want to complain about prosperity now?

    The Vikings and the Bills and Eagles have been around since the start of the NFL/AFL merger and are still looking for their first win. They are a combined 0-10 in Super Bowls.

    The Titans/Oilers have had some great teams over the years, yet have ONE super bowl appearance (a loss). Seahawks have one appearance in their history (also a loss). Chargers fans have never tasted what a NFL championship feels like either.

    The Redskins and Cowboys, two of the biggest fan bases in the country, have gone a combined 38 years since APPEARING in a super Bowl. Still feel like two titles in 17 years isn't good enough?

    Raiders have been to 1 super bowl ( a loss) in the last 30 years. It's been 28 years since the Dolphins even appeared in a Super Bowl.

    Broncos have fielded a lot of very good teams over the last decade+ and still are now at 14 years and counting without a Super Bowl appearance.

    Smile, Ravens nation, and realize how blessed we are to have the type of success we've had"
    Great Post!



  9. #29

    Re: 2 Super Bowl Rings in 17 years

    Quote Originally Posted by pslholder96 View Post
    All I have to say is enjoy this run and really appreciate the effort our FO does to keep our team competitive. While I hope it doesn't happen if we don't make the playoffs next year just watch some our spoiled fanbase calling for John and Ozzie's head and asking for the roster to get blown up.
    Shoot, there'll be people calling for Mr. Harbaugh and Mr. Newsome's heads right after the first loss of the season lol!
    That fact is about the safest bet one can make on these boards.

    I am extremely appreciative of the history this team has built in so short a time. I think the org will continue to be successful, but i won't be mad if we don't get a SB every 8.5 years. I'll take the ups with the downs no problem.
    Visit your heroes at the Sports Legends Museum
    Preserve Baltimore's sports legacy - before it fades away!

    http://www.baberuthmuseum.org/exhibits/slmacy/



  10. #30

    Re: 2 Super Bowl Rings in 17 years

    Quote Originally Posted by Losac View Post
    The Colts were favored by 18 points going into the game. Earl Morrall had started the entire season and had a career year. Plus didn't Shula stick with Morrall during the season even when Unitas was technically able to return? They only put Unitas into the game in the second half as a desperation move. It's still considered probably the biggest upset in the history of pro football. I'd call that a choke.
    Fixed is more like it, Bookies all knew that. LOL



  11. #31
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    7,325
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: 2 Super Bowl Rings in 17 years

    Look at all the cities like Philly Buff, Cinci, Minn and others that don't have any so it's even more incredible and it's such a young organization. Philly fans with their rich tradition in baseball and
    other pro sports would kill for our football tradition.

    We have as many SB trophies as Piss in the CAP era. They beat Cards and Seattle while we beat NY and SF.


    We also have 3 SB trophies with 2 teams while sitting out of the league for 12 years. That makes this even more incredible.

    Yea, it's way too early to start yelling repeat. It's almost impossible to keep a super team together. We're already talking about losing Bodin and Ellerbe but we'll at least make the
    playoffs for the 6th straight year, more than any team in football.

    Even Jerry JOnes just said the Boyz are trying to be like the Ravens and he's been doing it longer than Ozzie. He has all those pre-CAP SB trophies but none since Ozzie came along.
    Pic of a natural act.



  12. #32

    Re: 2 Super Bowl Rings in 17 years

    Quote Originally Posted by AirFlacco View Post
    Look at all the cities like Philly Buff, Cinci, Minn and others that don't have any so it's even more incredible and it's such a young organization. Philly fans with their rich tradition in baseball and
    other pro sports would kill for our football tradition.

    We have as many SB trophies as Piss in the CAP era. They beat Cards and Seattle while we beat NY and SF.


    We also have 3 SB trophies with 2 teams while sitting out of the league for 12 years. That makes this even more incredible.Yea, it's way too early to start yelling repeat. It's almost impossible to keep a super team together. We're already talking about losing Bodin and Ellerbe.
    Great observation, I had not even considered that.



  13. #33

    Re: 2 Super Bowl Rings in 17 years

    If the Ravens win a Super Bowl every 12 years, then I'm cool with that. Of course, at my age, I've got 2 maybe 3 more in sight. Ray Lewis retired after a Super bowl victory, I'd be happy to "retire" from this Earth the day after another Ravens Super Bowl victory. My wife would weep tears for my demise, but be glad that my last days were filled with Ravens joy. My sister-in-law would also weep because the money well (that's me) would have dried up... Bc



  14. #34
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Cub Hill, MD
    Posts
    2,066

    Re: 2 Super Bowl Rings in 17 years

    Quote Originally Posted by AirFlacco View Post
    Yea, it's way too early to start yelling repeat. It's almost impossible to keep a super team together. We're already talking about losing Bodin and Ellerbe but we'll at least make the playoffs for the 6th straight year, more than any team in football.
    "At least" make the playoffs? I wouldn't say that. Good chance maybe.


    WORLD CHAMPIONS 2012



  15. #35
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    7,325
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: 2 Super Bowl Rings in 17 years

    Yea, you're probably right but we just made it 5 years in a row with this team and it's still gonna be enough to at least make the POs. Joe will probably sign and Rice and Torrey and those guys
    will be back. There's still a chance to keep Boldin. Ray is gone but if we can keep Ellerbe the defense is still better than most.

    And we should have Webb back. To think we won the SB w/o our best corner makes it even more incredible and gives us a shot at the POs. Jimmy will be back and better too. That
    makes our secondary even better than this year even with Carey Williams leaving, if he leaves.
    Pic of a natural act.



  16. #36
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Toluca Lake, CA
    Posts
    406

    Re: 2 Super Bowl Rings in 17 years

    Yes, that is an achievement. But, also they are competitive year in and year out that is also impressive. 9 playoff appearances since 2000. When the Browns moved here they were an awful team those first few years with an out of date head coach.



  17. #37

    Re: 2 Super Bowl Rings in 17 years

    Quote Originally Posted by lovefootball View Post
    Fixed is more like it, Bookies all knew that. LOL
    Agree. That game was fixed.



  18. #38

    Re: 2 Super Bowl Rings in 17 years

    Quote Originally Posted by TheOrioleWay View Post
    Actually, it was bittersweet. I had stored some of his more caustic e-mails about Flacco with the intention of returning them to him in the eventuality that Flacco won a SB (MVP was a bonus). Some mentioned the "Dilfer Curse" and we'd "never win a SB with Flacco at the helm". The more recent ones referred to "Flake-O, the nerd" and put him in the group of "loser QB's like Romo, Cutler, etc.that will never see a title".

    I was going to throw them in his face, but couldn't after his humble "I was wrong" admission, so I decided to take the high road as he had done. Oh well.
    I could never understand how fans of other teams got so invested in being "right" about Flacco sucking. The whole thing was very weird.



  19. #39

    Re: 2 Super Bowl Rings in 17 years

    I can't see how our five Championships grew to ten, unless also counting CFL, USFL, AAFC, the conference championship of 1964, the NFL win followed by the Super Bowl loss of 1968, etc. The five were:

    1958 "Greatest Game Ever Played"
    1959
    1971
    2002
    2012

    Pittsburgh, who has been around since the 1930s, has earned more Championships (6) than Baltimore (5 Championships since 1950).

    If you want to keep more recent comparisons: Pitt is 2-2 since 1995; Baltimore is 2-0.
    In a 2003 BBC poll that asked Brits to name the "Greatest American Ever", Mr. T came in fourth, behind ML King (3rd), Abe Lincoln (2nd) and Homer Simpson (1st).



  20. #40

    Re: 2 Super Bowl Rings in 17 years

    Quote Originally Posted by HotInHere View Post
    I go back and forth on this technicality. I would be interested in people's thoughts on our '68 "championship."
    The Only Thing that counts is World Championships, and '68 was not one of them. To be honest and fair, Baltimore has 5 World Championships, not six(, but Baltimore has won World Championships at a faster rate than has Pittsburgh, for those interested in this sort of thing, which I am)!
    "Grab those pusillanimous sons-a-bitches by the nose and kick 'em in the balls.." General George S. Patton



Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Russell Street Report Website Design by D3Corp Ocean City Maryland