Results 21 to 40 of 51
Thread: King Dunlop views on him?
-
Re: King Dunlop views on him?
-
Re: King Dunlop views on him?
-
Re: King Dunlop views on him?
I was thinking the same thing. If it's one thing the playoff run proved, it's how deadly the offense can be with a good offensive line. I think hiring Castillo is part of the plan to eventually dominate in that arena. Perhaps they've decided to stop pussyfooting around and really shore up a solid young line that can work with Joe for years to come.
-
02-23-2013, 07:36 PM #24
On The Practice Squad
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- Towson
- Posts
- 37
Re: King Dunlop views on him?
Pass on Dunlop.... Hoping McKinnie is back and under 360 in 2013 !!!
-
02-24-2013, 08:27 AM #25
Re: King Dunlop views on him?
The few games i saw i didnt really care for dunlap. Most eagles fans i know dont really care for the guy much amd quite frankly, sounds pretty similar to our fanbases thoughts on oher. I dont think he was really "better" than oher id say both are pretty much proving not to be NFL LTs. If its dunlop Oher or a rookie... Id take the rookie. Even inexperienced at this point i have to assume if we draft one in the first two rounds hell be better than either or atleast have more upside and be better with more experience. To me Dunlap is only an option if we lose out on drafting one we targeted early and hes still available after the draft for depth. Even then we may wait to see if a vet gets cut later.
-JAB
-
Re: King Dunlop views on him?
Dunlop is going to be available latter on in free agency. He's not someone that any team will be in a rush to sign but he eventually will make a roster.
-
02-24-2013, 09:59 AM #27
-
02-24-2013, 10:35 AM #28
Regular 1st Stringer
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Posts
- 974
Re: King Dunlop views on him?
I think Dunlap is going to be one of the best value to price relationships.
He'll be 28 in September, McKinnie will be 34 just 2 weeks later. That matters less if we're talking about a 1-2 year deal, but the projected decline in even a full season of activity for McKinnie is non-trivial.
McKinnie and Dunlap have a lot of similarities, particularly in terms of height, and natural pass blocking advantages, while neither is an effective run blocker.
Assuming they were the same price, I'd take Dunlap first. I'm not sure how the market will value them.
-
-
Re: King Dunlop views on him?
I know. It's kind of a joke with Excellector and me. For months he was posting that Clady would be a Raven and I would always reply that there is no way the Broncos don't tag Clady. Looks like he finally agrees and has moved on to Long. Honestly I don't the Ravens able to sign any contracts of that size this year.
-
02-24-2013, 12:09 PM #31
Re: King Dunlop views on him?
"When questioned, the Elders explained that they were in search of magical powers. However, they're actually searching for the whereabouts of a certain ring. This ring is a legendary treasure that long ago was known to exist"
-
02-24-2013, 12:12 PM #32
Re: King Dunlop views on him?
I'm not out of it yet Batman! Randy Moss is an UFA, the market will be full of LTs and no one else has drafted Tavon Austin or Mike Minter yet.
"When questioned, the Elders explained that they were in search of magical powers. However, they're actually searching for the whereabouts of a certain ring. This ring is a legendary treasure that long ago was known to exist"
-
Re: King Dunlop views on him?
-
02-24-2013, 02:16 PM #34
Re: King Dunlop views on him?
"When questioned, the Elders explained that they were in search of magical powers. However, they're actually searching for the whereabouts of a certain ring. This ring is a legendary treasure that long ago was known to exist"
-
02-25-2013, 06:06 AM #35
Regular 1st Stringer
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Posts
- 974
Re: King Dunlop views on him?
I score the Ravens games for linemen and look at PFF as an anchor site. For the great majority of games, PFF and my scoring are very close. For PFF, Oher's pass blocking score was considerably lower than Dunlap's, who accomplished that positive score in fewer snaps.
There are issues with Dunlap as a run blocker (as there are with Oher), but on the left side, we need a guy who can deliver some pressure shutouts, which Dunlap did.
-
Re: King Dunlop views on him?
I would be good with them signing Dunlap (because he would be a decent stop-gap guy and would be cheap), but I would hope that they wouldn't sign him and then be in the same exact boat next off-season with the LT position.
Sign Dunlap.
Draft someone that has a legitimate shot at developing into a LT.When it comes to quarterbacks, don't pay attention to stats; pay attention to guys who make crucial plays at crucial times. -Gil Brandt
My RSR Blog:
http://russellstreetreport.com/author/paullukoskie/
-
02-25-2013, 10:02 AM #37
-
02-25-2013, 12:13 PM #38
Regular 1st Stringer
- Join Date
- Nov 2011
- Posts
- 400
Re: King Dunlop views on him?
King Dunlap is terrible. He's an end of the bench guy. There is no way he is a better option than either McKinnie or Oher.
-
02-25-2013, 05:36 PM #39
Regular 1st Stringer
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Location
- Honolulu
- Posts
- 324
-
Re: King Dunlop views on him?
Don't understand why people think he's worse than Michael Oher at LT, you all have short memories.




Reply With Quote

Bookmarks