Kucinich Introduces Single Article of Impeachment for President Bush

**Galen Sevinne** · 07-11-2008, 11:13 AM

Congressmember Dennis Kucinich has introduced a single article of impeachment against President Bush. The article accuses Bush of deceiving Congress to authorize the invasion of Iraq. Kucinich says he introduced the measure in part to simplify the thirty-five articles of impeachment he introduced against Bush a month ago. This week, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi suggested the House Judiciary Committee could soon take up the measure.

**Greg** · 07-11-2008, 04:44 PM

Congressman Quixote is off and running.

**Khaine** · 07-11-2008, 05:57 PM

It's more of a scuttle - not a run...

isn't it?

**HoustonRaven** · 07-12-2008, 09:02 AM

Yawn.

Id agree with it if there was deception. But when every member of the UN Security Council was saying the same thing about Iraq before the war, you kinda lose your cred. The majority of the people know this is a joke.

I can see it now. Bush will subpoena all 9 heads of state. Botox Nancy will pull a "Bush Lied, People Died" bumper sticker from her suitcase and say "see, I told you so!"

I, for one, hope the Democrats actually pull this off. That will be the fastest way for the GOP to get back Congress.

**ravenmaniac** · 07-12-2008, 12:52 PM

Its probably slightly more important than the BJ impeachment.

**Greg** · 07-13-2008, 01:45 PM

Its probably slightly more important than the BJ impeachment.

LOL, uh, the "BJ impeachment" was over a president committing perjury, a felony. This is about questionable use of intelligence. And did you happen to note all of the yellow cake uranium recently noted. We waited until we had it all out before announcing how much was there, probably to keep it from being a target but there was a bit.

If Clinton were a decent man who would have resigned over the BJ and not committed the felony.

**jonboy79** · 07-13-2008, 03:33 PM

over 500 metric TONS...

And the necessary delivery equipment, it simply wasn't put together... I don't think the intel was NEARLY as bad as we were led to believe. He could have had a full scale Nuclear program within a month or two.

**Greg** · 07-13-2008, 08:19 PM

I don't think he had the ability to turn the yellow cake into weapons grade material, you need some pretty sophisticated centrifuges for that.

**jonboy79** · 07-14-2008, 10:49 AM

I read one article that said that, and another that basically said he could have been up and running in short order if he wanted to...

So let's put it this way, the intel was NOWHERE near as off, as we were led to believe.

**Galen Sevinne** · 07-14-2008, 04:03 PM

Originally Posted by jonboy79

So let's put it this way, the intel was NOWHERE near as off, as we were led to believe.

Except for the little fact that both U.N. inspectors and the IAEA documented the so reported yellowcake, which had been stored in aging drums and containers since before the 1991 Gulf War.

There was no evidence of any yellowcake dating from after 1991...except of the course the ever elusive nigerian connection which ended up blowing up in the face of the current administration via Valerie Plame. But credit Rove and the likes of anne (sic) coulter for minimizing this incident by calling it no more than a liberal bumper sticker.

**Galen Sevinne** · 07-14-2008, 04:13 PM

Originally Posted by TRAP

Thirty years from now they'll be calling W a genius for going in.

Want to bet retirement savings???? I'm in if you are.

Originally Posted by TRAP

And the Bible says in Daniel that in the last days Babylon would be rebuilt.

Sodom alreay uncovered the Isthar-sp Gate and Nebecanezzar's Southern Palace and the US Marines used that palace as a headquarters during the war.

Sodom had planned to move into it himself.

And the UN is in there. They want to make it a cultural center.

Keep your eyes on Babylon.

I was going to say something here as well but couldn't come up with anything that would do your comments justice.

AS William Hurt once said in The Big Chill, "Sometimes just have to let art flow over you to appreciate it" minor paraphrasing of course.

**Rochardrik** · 07-15-2008, 01:57 PM

Originally Posted by TRAP

Jonboy is right and 30 years from now the country will be happy W went in.

Thanks for changing that. The dumbest pres we have EVER had does not deserve to be called a genius. That gives stupidity a bad name!!! UGH! And no, we will not even be thankful. He has de-stabilized the entire region, and the effects of that will linger long after we are gone! The fallout of his stupidity will take a century to completely unfold. In the meantime, he has shown the world that we are not as mighty as we think, or as they had thought. And THAT is the absolute worst consequence of his actions!

**Rochardrik** · 07-15-2008, 02:04 PM

Originally Posted by jonboy79

over 500 metric TONS...

And the necessary delivery equipment, it simply wasn't put together... I don't think the intel was NEARLY as bad as we were led to believe. He could have had a full scale Nuclear program within a month or two.

Obviously a Fox News watcher!

**jonboy79** · 07-15-2008, 03:56 PM

What part do you disagree with? DO you think they planted 550 metric tons of Uranium and then secretly delivered it to Canada, and THEN made a story about it, LONG after the war began to clear the name of a Pres on his way out ina few months?

**HoustonRaven** · 07-15-2008, 04:09 PM

Originally Posted by jonboy79

What part do you disagree with? DO you think they planted 550 metric tons of Uranium and then secretly delivered it to Canada, and THEN made a story about it, LONG after the war began to clear the name of a Pres on his way out ina few months?

Yes, they actually DO believe that.

In one breath, W and is ilk are supreme idiots and the next, they have the ability to plant 500 tons of nuke material and have the clout to cover it up. They cant get their theories straight. Michelle Malkin so aptly labeled it -- Bush Derangement Syndrome.

If they just kept quiet and pointed towards pesky things like facts, they'd see that W puts his own head in the noose on his own most of the time.

**Galen Sevinne** · 07-15-2008, 09:31 PM

Originally Posted by jonboy79

What part do you disagree with? DO you think they planted 550 metric tons of Uranium and then secretly delivered it to Canada, and THEN made a story about it, LONG after the war began to clear the name of a Pres on his way out ina few months?

The 550 tons of yellow cake was there during the 1991 gulf war. The u.n. inspectors knew about it...the world knew about it and several agencies were watching it. It is not like this stuff just showed up last year. Everyone has known about it since before 1991 - that is over 17 years. If we went to war over this stuff, Bush would have said, "hey this guy has 550 metric tons of yeller-cake uranium and we need to take him out" The weapons of mass destruction (which this stuff was not even close to that nor a reason to be bogged down in a 5+ year war) would have meant something else.

Here is a quote from the fair and balanced guys at Faux News"

"Israeli warplanes bombed a reactor project at the site in 1981. Later, U.N. inspectors documented and safeguarded the yellowcake, which had been stored in aging drums and containers since before the 1991 Gulf War. There was no evidence of any yellowcake dating from after 1991, the official said."

The link for the complete story:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,376747,00.html

Always read closely into the stories when it comes from an obviously partisan source. This report is in no way the smoking gun of Bush's legacy...he is still the bumbling idiot that has changed the meaning of what it means to be an American. Of course the right will slant this story ever so slightly to just "seed" the idea that maybe this is the WMD's. Then the Hannitys, Coulters and Oreillys of the world will take it to the house and people will think it si something that it really is not.

**jonboy79** · 07-15-2008, 10:43 PM

I understand it is 17 years old, but if it can be processed and turned into weapons, then all it takes is intel to let someone know that process may have been in the short term future and...

No it's not a smoking gun, but then again it's something, it's certainly no tnothing...

**Rochardrik** · 07-16-2008, 10:07 AM

"FAUX" news... now why didn't I think of that!... That's seriously funny... seriously! (catch the double entendre?)... the seriously funny part. What's serious is that so many people listen and gobble it up, like it was Real, not Faux

**Galen Sevinne** · 07-16-2008, 11:03 AM

Originally Posted by Rochardrik

"FAUX" news... now why didn't I think of that!... That's seriously funny... seriously! (catch the double entendre?)... the seriously funny part. What's serious is that so many people listen and gobble it up, like it was Real, not Faux

Well, I will warn you ahead of time there are not too many people on this board who see through that money-making propaganda machine at Faux. I hear Karl Rove is now on their staff...boy he will surely be fair and balanced! It won't be long until he releases his string of New York Times best sellers. That is the crazy part that all of those folks there sell a shit load of books. Since when in the history of time did newscasters become best selling writiers? I worry about this country for sure.

**Rochardrik** · 07-16-2008, 11:31 AM

Originally Posted by Galen Sevinne

Well, I will warn you ahead of time there are not too many people on this board who see through that money-making propaganda machine at Faux. I hear Karl Rove is now on their staff...boy he will surely be fair and balanced! It won't be long until he releases his string of New York Times best sellers. That is the crazy part that all of those folks there sell a shit load of books. Since when in the history of time did newscasters become best selling writiers? I worry about this country for sure.

To those people of whom you speak, who get their info from O'Reilly and Rush, Cheney proclaimed at the end of Gulf War 1 that the reason we did not continue to Baghdad and capture Saddam was that such a move would create a civil war, and cause the entire region to de-stabilize, creating problems both for us and our allies. What's changed?. Rush said on the air in 1988, I think,..... So, Saddam gassed a few Kurds, and now we get all this liberal Hate speak as if Saddam was a monster fit to be removed from power..... (paraphrased, of course) .And these " fair" pundents count on their audiences to have short memories. The wind of public opinion shifts and they go right with it! I try to listen to all sides to form my opinion, but, even when a member of their "ilk" is completely and totally proved to be wrong, they cannot admit it , but choose rather to "spin" the story into a defamation of the source of the information or otherwise excuse the blatant lies (Karl Rove, Scooter Libby)... and the "Liberal media" has an agenda?, but they don't? UGHHHHH!!!!