Results 21 to 24 of 24
-
12-20-2006, 03:32 PM #21
Re: Three Point Underdogs Against the Squeelers??
Now, if that really happened, I am thinking PPV.
-
12-20-2006, 03:44 PM #22
Stupid and Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Posts
- 254
-
12-23-2006, 09:22 PM #23
Re: Three Point Underdogs Against the Squeelers??
I put a unit on the Ravens +3.5 and the under 36.5 for this weekend for a couple reasons...
1) I look for covers with the O/U. Who do I think will cover and what do I think has to happen if they don't. Here, I think that for the Steelers to cover the spread, they must completely shut down our O and not let our D score, and I don't think our D will allow them to score more than 21. 21-17 is the only score I worry about, hence the U off-sets my risk with Ravens to cover.
2) I also think it goes Ravens cover + U a LOT more than Steelers cover + O (should go without saying, but I expect to win two a good bit more than I lose two...far more than enough to cover the vig).
3) Home field is usually 3 points. I think it's nuts to think that any 7-7 team vs. an 11-3 team can be even money on a neutral field, especially when that 7-7 team played that 11-3 team earlier in the year and got absolutely obliterated.
The Steelers are 3-0 in their last three and 5-1 their last six (all three teams they beat suck, BTW). But we're chopped liver? We've won two straight including a tough one @ KC and are 7-1 our last eight.
That line just doesn't seem right to me. I love that it's +3.5 and not +2.5 cause I think this one could easily come down to a FG at the last second, either way. The only thing that concerns me is how many won't play. If 3 of our injured 6 sit out, then I don't think there's much if any EV+ here. But I expect our D to shut down their run game, and Ben hasn't been a good passer when forced to throw a lot.
- C -
-
12-24-2006, 08:20 AM #24
Re: Three Point Underdogs Against the Squeelers??
The three points is only a home field amount given.


Reply With Quote



Bookmarks