Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 46
  1. #21

    Re: Was Suggs really playing basketball, after all?



    Who gives a shit.
    Lardarius "The predator" Webb





  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    baltimore
    Posts
    2,043
    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonRaven View Post
    Repetitive motion type injury.

    It's something you see similar to runners injuries. The same motion over time tears down the tendons and surrounding muscle until they finally give out.
    Oh ok. I know nothing about the injury but from what I heard on the radio and someone has told me that its pretty tough to come back from right away. I can't help but to think when they said Nolan Reimold of the Orioles may be done for his career but he came back after this same injury.

    I guess time will tell. Hopefully Suggs can get himself right before long.

    Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2



  3. #23
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Greensboro, North Carolina
    Posts
    3,667

    Re: Was Suggs really playing basketball, after all?

    Honestly, I care more about Suggs desire to play this season than I do what he was doing when he got hurt. I'll be beyond blown if he misses half of this season, still comes back to soon, injures it worse and puts next season in jeopardy. I really hope the Ravens shut him down and leave him there.



  4. #24

    Re: Was Suggs really playing basketball, after all?

    Quote Originally Posted by Shas View Post
    I've never quite figured out why playing basketball is considered a dumb way to stay in shape compared to some of the other bizarre training routines (like throwing around tractor tires).
    To me a non story. it is a way tostay in shape. A certain SS who played a whole lot of games in a row played a lot of basketball. He even has a gym in his house. It happens, nothing to complain about IMO.



  5. #25
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Baltimore
    Posts
    1,724

    Re: Was Suggs really playing basketball, after all?

    Mike B put the finger on it. An athlete playing sports in the off-season should hardly be considered a dangerous activity. Now other shit like motorcycle w/o helmet etc should be considered out of bounds (no pun) IMO. I was surprised by the ESPN article only because of the timing. I never thought the Ravens would go after Sizzle for $, they simply don't roll like that.

    The Ravens are a class act.....always have been. Nothing to see here folks.
    "If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster... And treat those two impostors just the same" - Rudyard Kipling



  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    San Dimas, CA
    Posts
    2,319

    Re: Was Suggs really playing basketball, after all?

    Things happen.

    Prohibiting a player from playing basketball in the off season makes as much sense as prohibiting a player from using the stairs in the middle of the night.



  7. #27

    Re: Was Suggs really playing basketball, after all?

    This is a non-story. A first class organization with a first class state of the art training facility that includes a basketball court won't withold any money from Suggs regardless of this latest revelation.



  8. #28
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Charm City
    Posts
    15,585
    Blog Entries
    3

    Re: Was Suggs really playing basketball, after all?

    I agree that this is a non-story. Accidents happen. At least he was doing something active and he wasn't crashing a motorcycle in a parking lot being a dumbass on it or something.

    All the Ravens care about is getting him healthy and trying to get him out on the field this year.
    When it comes to quarterbacks, don't pay attention to stats; pay attention to guys who make crucial plays at crucial times. -Gil Brandt


    My RSR Blog:
    http://russellstreetreport.com/author/paullukoskie/



  9. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Wilton, CT
    Posts
    8,680
    Blog Entries
    3

    Re: Was Suggs really playing basketball, after all?

    Quote Originally Posted by BleedPurple92 View Post
    Who gives a shit.
    PFT seems to. They kept on printing how the Ravens could take away money from Suggs if they wanted to when clearly they never would.
    He Who Dares.....Wins


    Follow me on Twitter @GOTAlee



  10. #30
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Stevensville, MD
    Posts
    1,076

    Re: Was Suggs really playing basketball, after all?

    Couldn't care less. And I understand if he tried to keep it quiet, since the media and some ppl would (and are) being stupid about it. It's not like he was doing something crazy like basejumping or cave diving.
    Never get in a fight with a pig; you both get muddy, and the pig likes it...




  11. #31

    Re: Was Suggs really playing basketball, after all?

    I'm of the firm belief that players should be sealed in carbonite at season's end and held under Jabba's palace until the start of training camp.



  12. #32
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Where Ravens Fans Roam Free
    Posts
    1,260

    Re: Was Suggs really playing basketball, after all?

    Isn't playing basketball prohibited in the CBA? If so, why have it in there if you are not going to enforce that ban?



  13. #33

    Re: Was Suggs really playing basketball, after all?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dirt1 View Post
    Isn't playing basketball prohibited in the CBA? If so, why have it in there if you are not going to enforce that ban?
    I seriously doubt it. If so does that mean the ravens have to rip out their basketball court?



  14. #34
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Where Ravens Fans Roam Free
    Posts
    1,260

    Re: Was Suggs really playing basketball, after all?

    Quote Originally Posted by pslholder96 View Post
    I seriously doubt it. If so does that mean the ravens have to rip out their basketball court?
    I think the ban applies to playing basketball outside of team facilities. I think it is a stupid ban, but I have heard it referred to several times as being in the CBA.



  15. #35

    Re: Was Suggs really playing basketball, after all?

    Quote Originally Posted by GOTA View Post
    PFT seems to. They kept on printing how the Ravens could take away money from Suggs if they wanted to when clearly they never would.
    The story is that they CAN, not that they WILL.

    I'd rather him risk injury playing basketball, then come to camp out of shape like a few years ago when it took him most of the season to get into shape.
    Basketball, IMO, is great cardio exercise that is interesting and FUN, so it encourages longer, harder workouts then a stationary bike and the like. True it is higher impact with some risk of injury, but who cares. We are talking abotu world class athletes who presumably have good balance, stretchign habits and some talent and ability to play general sports.

    bad luck, that's it.
    I still say that unless the CBA prohibits it they should take away what salary then can, and have Stevie B pay him to "headhunt' for him in the interim, half a mil a week or whatever he would have been paid... I'm sure hte CBA does prohibit it, so just leavve him alone and let him rehab.



  16. #36
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pasadena
    Posts
    6,254
    Blog Entries
    3

    Re: Was Suggs really playing basketball, after all?

    PFT and ESPN are trying to drum up a story. That's all it is. Injuries can happen doing anything. It was just bad luck for Suggs and the Ravens. I know everyone remembers Welker and Andre Johnson blowing out their ACL's without being touched.



  17. #37
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    San Dimas, CA
    Posts
    2,319

    Re: Was Suggs really playing basketball, after all?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dirt1 View Post
    I think the ban applies to playing basketball outside of team facilities. I think it is a stupid ban, but I have heard it referred to several times as being in the CBA.
    I don't see it, but maybe you can. Here is the entire CBA:

    https://images.nflplayers.com/mediaR...es/2011CBA.pdf

    There are references to "non-football related injuries" concerning compensation (page 128) and injury grievances (page 193), but I did not see the word basketball specifically mentioned at all. There is the ability of the club to place a player who has a non-football related injury on a non-football injury list, and then the player is not paid, although the years on the contract continue to accrue. So in that case basketball isn't prohibited, but a player can lose salary from an injury gotten while playing basketball (non-football related). I think that's where the Ravens are choosing (wisely) not to go.

    Maybe it's in another section but I doubt it. I only skimmed it, however.



  18. #38

    Re: Was Suggs really playing basketball, after all?

    I agree that playing basketball in and of itself isn't a problematic sort of thing for a professional football player, since injuries can happen at any time while engaged in any activity (although it's inarguable that playing basketball is riskier than walking down the street or sitting on the couch.)

    But the business aspect of this discussion is more complicated than that. It's not just about what Suggs was doing, it's that he was doing it while not in any way under the control and supervision of the Ravens organization. He was engaging in an activity that 1) risked damaging his ability to carry out his contractual obligations, 2) wasn't sanctioned or supervised by the team, and 3) wasn't incidental to the activities of everyday life (i.e. he wasn't walking down the street or bending over to pick up a book at the library.)

    He could have torn his Achilles while engaging in a Ravens-sanctioned charity sporting event, or while playing basketball on the Ravens' basketball court in their own facility, or while doing squats in the Ravens' gym at the facility while under the supervision of their trainers, but those situations would be VERY different because in those hypothetical situations Suggs would be subject to the control and supervision of the Ravens' organization and presumably had their approval to do those things.

    So I think it is a little bit hairy here and not quite as much of a non-story as people are making it. Some say Ben's motorcycle accident was clearly unacceptable while this is clearly acceptable, but where do you draw that line? The only way for players IMO to really completely clear themselves against any liability here is at a minimum to make sure they have team approval before engaging in any kind of extracurricular athletics or anything of that nature. Maybe it sounds excessive, but at least it's consistent.

    The fact that Suggs continues to apparently lie about it also concerns me, to be honest. If it's not a big deal, why lie about it?



  19. #39
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Charm City
    Posts
    15,585
    Blog Entries
    3

    Re: Was Suggs really playing basketball, after all?

    Quote Originally Posted by bmorecareful View Post
    The fact that Suggs continues to apparently lie about it also concerns me, to be honest. If it's not a big deal, why lie about it?
    Following his agent's & the Ravens Organization's lead?
    When it comes to quarterbacks, don't pay attention to stats; pay attention to guys who make crucial plays at crucial times. -Gil Brandt


    My RSR Blog:
    http://russellstreetreport.com/author/paullukoskie/



  20. #40
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    1,866
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Was Suggs really playing basketball, after all?

    I didn't realize Suggs has talked about how it happened since the couple of days after it happened. I guess I must have missed later denials by him.



Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Russell Street Report Website Design by D3Corp Ocean City Maryland