Plax back in black-n-yellow?

**wickedsolo** · 08-07-2012, 09:37 AM

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...-to-the-burgh/

Quarterback Ben Roethlisberger surely would welcome it, and Burress could provide an interesting complement to the rest of the team’s receivers.

**The Excellector** · 08-07-2012, 09:40 AM

For some reason, I don't believe that the Steelers would seriously consider this. At least, I think they would wait to see more of what they have from Sanders and see if Burress' price goes down. Still, I don't think they would do it.

**wickedsolo** · 08-07-2012, 09:45 AM

Apparently they already have, but he's asking for too much $$$.

**JAB1985** · 08-07-2012, 10:08 AM

plaxico could possibly be the best red zone WR in the game, even at his age. Look at Sanchez's ability in the redzone that didnt match his ability anywhere else. I think Plaxico had more to do with that than anything. its really the only area their offense excelled. I wouldnt want him on the steelers as thats the only thing theyre really lacking in their corps at the moment.

**GOTA** · 08-07-2012, 10:25 AM

Ben was trying to get the Steelers to sign Plax last year as well. Plax has a big problem with back taxes so he'll eventually lower his price because he needs a job

**RavensNTerps** · 08-07-2012, 10:47 AM

Originally Posted by JAB1985

plaxico could possibly be the best red zone WR in the game, even at his age. Look at Sanchez's ability in the redzone that didnt match his ability anywhere else. I think Plaxico had more to do with that than anything. its really the only area their offense excelled. I wouldnt want him on the steelers as thats the only thing theyre really lacking in their corps at the moment.

This is why I'd give him a long hard look. We need help in the RZ. Bad.

**SC_Raven_Fan** · 08-07-2012, 10:56 AM

Heard his interview on NFL Radio the other day. He said at least 2 teams were interested in him.

I'm really surprised he's not back with the Jets, unless they blame him for some of the "anonymous" player quotes from last year. They need him back in a bad way, IMO.

**SC_Raven_Fan** · 08-07-2012, 10:57 AM

Heard his interview on NFL Radio the other day. He said at least 2 teams were interested in him.

I'm really surprised he's not back with the Jets, unless they blame him for some of the "anonymous" player quotes from last year. They need him back in a bad way, IMO.

**wickedsolo** · 08-07-2012, 10:57 AM

Originally Posted by SC_Raven_Fan

Heard his interview on NFL Radio the other day. He said at least 2 teams were interested in him.

I'm really surprised he's not back with the Jets, unless they blame him for some of the "anonymous" player quotes from last year. They need him back in a bad way, IMO.

And their current receivers really are a bunch of massively unproven guys behind Holmes.

**JAB1985** · 08-07-2012, 11:01 AM

Originally Posted by wickedsolo

And their current receivers really are a bunch of massively unproven guys behind Holmes.

... and apparently antonio cormartie is their #2. Id say call Plax back even if he was the anonymous quotes, he wasnt exactly lying anyway.

**Beau Petard** · 08-07-2012, 12:21 PM

[in my best, most sincere SunSpot posting voice]

Ozzie should offer Pitt Streeter, Jacoby Jones and Anthony Allen for Burress, Max Starks and a 2nd rounder in 2013. That way Pitt gets receiving depth and a great back-up RB, and the Ravens would get the veteran WR experience they need from a straight-shooter like Plaxico, depth on the O-line, and a decent draft pick for the future, plus they would save $7 million in CAP space.

**Ravenswintitle** · 08-07-2012, 12:38 PM

I find it odd that T.O., Moss, Braylon Edwards and other receivers are playing but Plax still can't get someone to sign him for the vet minimum.

**wickedsolo** · 08-07-2012, 12:43 PM

Originally Posted by Ravenswintitle

I find it odd that T.O., Moss, Braylon Edwards and other receivers are playing but Plax still can't get someone to sign him for the vet minimum.

Probably because he's not looking for vet minimum.

**JAB1985** · 08-07-2012, 12:44 PM

Originally Posted by Ravenswintitle

I find it odd that T.O., Moss, Braylon Edwards and other receivers are playing but Plax still can't get someone to sign him for the vet minimum.

well from what Wicked is saying hes not accepting vet min, which is probably the only reason he isnt signed. Hell eventually settle for less and one of those 2 teams will sign him then.

**Ravenswintitle** · 08-07-2012, 12:46 PM

Originally Posted by JAB1985

well from what Wicked is saying hes not accepting vet min, which is probably the only reason he isnt signed. Hell eventually settle for less and one of those 2 teams will sign him then.

that's not what he said on SiriusNFL but then again who knows...

**madmikey** · 08-07-2012, 03:47 PM

I really don't see it happening. Sanders has looked good when he can play. And Cotchery has also looked good in limited reps. Burress would give the Steelers some depth and insurance, but even without Wallace I don't see him cracking the top 3 and I don't see Burress as a guy who would enjoy the bench.

**The Excellector** · 08-07-2012, 06:33 PM

Wouldn't this move be the proverbial 'blink', in a staring match?

**Complex** · 08-08-2012, 12:08 AM

No way. He has been knocking on the Steelers door in a roundabout way for awhile. I don't think the Steelers will answer the door. They need a tall receiver for a 6"5 QB to throw to in the end zone. But alas, I don't think the Steelers need Plax again that bad. However, a new OC just might want that option. At this point, without Mendy, the Steelers have a few RB's that are keen on the trucking running style that will gain the end zone more than Mendy did/does. But, that leaves long yardage regular downs out (?). Additionally, harder running RB's could limit the Steelers RZ options, no Mendy, no Wallace, and sans a tall, quick receiver. But, that also places the role of the TE into this discussion. Heath Miller anyone? Who knows. Haley will still have many options.

These scenarios and options go through the powers that be x10, none of us have any idea of the actual machinations of roster selection, game plans, and execution. But, as my layman-informed Steeler fandom perspective informs, I can solidly state again - No!

**SteelFaninBMore** · 08-08-2012, 11:27 PM

Originally Posted by The Excellector

Wouldn't this move be the proverbial 'blink', in a staring match?

Are you referring to the Steelers and Wallace? If anything, I think it be a sign that Pittsburgh is ready and willing to move on and look elsewhere for receivers.

There's really not much of a staring match, anyway. They've already said they will not trade him at any point this season, and unless a team comes forward with an amazing offer, I believe it. And they're not going to talk about a deal with him while he's not in camp. For better or for worse, the Steelers front office refuses to be strong armed by player demands. Better guys than Wallace have tried and failed. At this point the Steelers have basically told him that his options are to show up and play for his RFA tender, or sit at home until Week 10 watching the Sunday Ticket.

As for Plax, I think the Steelers would be open to bringing him back, if he's willing to sign for cheap, and take a role as the 3rd or maybe even 4th guy.

**The Excellector** · 08-09-2012, 11:48 AM

Originally Posted by SteelFaninBMore

Are you referring to the Steelers and Wallace? If anything, I think it be a sign that Pittsburgh is ready and willing to move on and look elsewhere for receivers.

There's really not much of a staring match, anyway. They've already said they will not trade him at any point this season, and unless a team comes forward with an amazing offer, I believe it. And they're not going to talk about a deal with him while he's not in camp. For better or for worse, the Steelers front office refuses to be strong armed by player demands. Better guys than Wallace have tried and failed. At this point the Steelers have basically told him that his options are to show up and play for his RFA tender, or sit at home until Week 10 watching the Sunday Ticket.

As for Plax, I think the Steelers would be open to bringing him back, if he's willing to sign for cheap, and take a role as the 3rd or maybe even 4th guy.

That's what I mean. The Steelers have taken their hard stance, as has Wallace. That sounds like a staring match to me.

The reason why the move to bring in Burress would represent a blink to me is, because it shows that they don't feel confident with their current group of guys, without Wallace. It would be different if they stuck with their guns, making Sanders a starter, which is what they seem to be doing. Signing Burress (Which they don't seem to be seriously considering, in my opinion) admits that they really aren't good to go without Wallace and with Sanders as a starter.