Is Jameel McClain in the Ravens’ future plans?

mcclainfumble

After suffering a spinal cord contusion during a Week 14 loss to the Washington Redskins, Ravens linebacker Jameel McClain was placed on Injured Reserve, thus ending his season and reducing his role to spectator during his team’s Super Bowl conquest.

Ravens’ general manager Ozzie Newsome identified their biggest area of need this offseason as the middle of their defense. Newsome already has his hands full trying to prepare for his first season without Ray Lewis anchoring the linebacking corps and needing to make a competitive offer to the team’s best performing linebacker, free-agent Dannell Ellerbe.

The combination of Ellerbe’s breakout season and an average performance from McClain prior to his injury could put his future in Baltimore in question. Last March, the Ravens resigned McClain to a three-year, $10.5 million contract. With a base salary of $3 million for this upcoming season, Newsome and the Ravens’ front office may use McClain’s injury to their advantage and attempt to save money against the salary cap.

During the “State of the Ravens” press conference, team owner Steve Bisciotti stated that he was more “apt to create space to get a few really good veterans for small amounts.” Even though linebackers Albert McClellan and Josh Bynes aren’t considered veterans, the same concept could be applied with younger and less expensive players, and comparing cost versus performance. The argument could be made that, based on McClain’s performance last season, there wouldn’t be much of a drop off to Bynes or McClellan.

Over the weekend, the Baltimore Sun reported that McClain is still consulting with doctors about his spinal cord contusion but the collective outlook is “positive”. While it appears McClain will be able to participate next season, the Ravens can use his injury to their advantage if they feel his performance doesn’t justify his $3 million base salary for 2013.

Due to his injury happening last season, McClain will not be offered an injury settlement; however, McClain is currently unable to pass a physical and the Ravens could release him with a “failed physical” designation. This same designation was recently applied to players like Johnny Knox, Ahmad Bradshaw and Nick Barnett.

If released with the “failed physical” designation, McClain would not be entitled to his base salary, but under Article 45 of the CBA, he will still be able to receive money from the league’s “Injury Protection” benefit. The benefit would act as a severance for McClain who would receive $1.05 million and $525,000 in 2014 if he was still unable to play. This may be a more attractive option to consider as the benefit won’t count against the Ravens’ salary cap (though, due to a rule change, that would not be the case starting in 2016.)

Releasing McClain does create $2.4 million in dead money, but the cash-strapped Ravens will save an additional $1.8 million this season during a time they’re seemingly going to be limited having to pay quarterback Joe Flacco top-tier money.

Resigning Flacco is obviously the team’s top priority but the next item on the list should be resigning Ellerbe. Having Ellerbe in place, the Ravens may decide to part with McClain as they’ll be able to retain a player knowledgeable with the current defense. Even though dead money will be created and the savings will be less than $2 million in 2013, the biggest gain will come in 2014, where the Ravens would likely not want to pay McClain if he produced in 2013 as he did a year prior.

Given that the franchise will sign the biggest check to a player in their history, all possibilities to save money must be – and will be – evaluated. McClain could very well fall victim to some creative bookkeeping at the hands of the Ravens front office.

Brian McFarland contributed to this article.

This entry was posted in Blog View, Featured by Kris Jones. Bookmark the permalink.

About Kris Jones

Kris Jones
Kris - or "Goob" as he's widely known - has turned an obsession into a career. As a media member by day and super fan by night, he reports from the Under Armour Performance Center twice per week and brings Ravens news from a fan's perspective. His popular YouTube series...more

3 Raves on “Is Jameel McClain in the Ravens’ future plans?

  1. ravensean509@gmail.com on said:

    I’ve posted on this subject before. Thanks for going into detail. I personally thought jameel was exceptionally dissapointing last year for a guy we had paid and were counting on amidst question marks in the LB corps. I thought he basically had the season that Cody/Maake K had at DT…………………..a clear need to upgrade if possible. He was a competent player previously (finally securing Bart Scott’s ILB spot) on star studded defenses. Unless he could play to at least his 2011 level, i’d sadly like to see an injury settlement for a guy who you had to root for. To me, even going into the 2011 offseason, i wouldn’t have made him a costly priority in any way. Just my opinion but i never saw much more than a decent 2 down run defender with little else to offer beside, possibly, intangibles. Maybe i’m spoiled watching the ravens D for 17 years but he’s one of it’s lesser starters.

  2. Bob S. on said:

    Goob –

    BTW, this question coming from one of your former Raleigh Ravens meetup crowd … FYI we had a good year and Robin has the meetup group still going strong!

    I thought when a player was released, the total dead money in the contract (which you stated was 2.4M) counted against the cap in the year the player was released. In that case, we’d have 3M (base salary) – 2.4M (dead money) and have only a 0.6M savings for 2013. You’ve stated a 1.8M savings, which implies the savings is 3M (base salary) – 1.2M (his 2013 bonus money only).

    Are you only counting the current year bonus money against the 2013 cap because of this being a “failed physical’ release rather than a typical release, or do I not understand the cap rules properly?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 

Hot off the street

RAVENS REPORT CARD: Ravens 23 Browns 21

Road Warriors: Ravens beat Browns on last second kick Overall: B+ After another week that saw the Ravens under media scrutiny for off the field issues instead of the focus being on the Ravens domi...read more

KNEE-JERK REACTIONS: Ravens Clip Browns 23-21

Ravens defense showed up when they had to and did what they failed to do in 2013...get off the field in the 4th quarter. Nice team win despite some shaky tackling in the secondary. - Tony Lombardi ...read more

Ravens at Browns: Looking Away From The Ball

The Ravens have won 11 of their 12 contests against the Browns during the John Harbaugh era by an average score of 24-13. Oftentimes, particularly in Cleveland, the games have been closely fought batt...read more

Ravens Own The Browns

Let' face it, Cleveland. We own you. It's a simple theory really. Do you all remember the T-Shirt Torrey Smith wore at the Super Bowl parade, the one that simply read '' Rings don't lie'' in Purple...read more

CRAB BAG: Ravens Look for Revenge in Dawg Pound

Just when we thought we could put all of this season's off-field ugliness behind us and finally start to focus on football, ESPN fanned the flames of controversy right as the coals seemed ready to die...read more

View More