MEDIA WATCHDOG: NFL Testing Fans Limits And Winning

Thursday_Night_Football1

Everybody whines about the quality of Thursday Night Football.

Head coaches repeatedly say that they put together a vanilla game plan because they don’t have enough time to properly prepare for an opponent during the short week. Fans flock to Facebook and Twitter to air their grievances about the poor quality of the match-ups and, as a result, the horrible product on the field.

Personally, I can’t stand watching the NFL Network struggle their way through a broadcast of these games. Thursday Night Football looks like something from the mid-90’s compared to what we’re watching on Sunday, Sunday night and Monday.

For the most part — and I’m sure some will tell me I’m wrong in the comments — everyone agrees with my assessment above. You’d think that this would result in the NFL looking to eliminate this joke of a night as it takes away from the lofty standard they set the rest of the week.

Well, you’d be wrong.

In 2012, Thursday Night Football ratings jumped to a record-high per game average audience of 7.3 million viewers, an eight percent increase from the 2011 season. That wasn’t particularly surprising as it was the first year in which all of the U.S. of A’s major cable providers carried the NFL Network. However, it is a tad bit surprising that their 2013 Thursday Night Football ratings are up ten percent from the previous season to a record-high per game average audience of 8 million viewers.

YouTube Preview Image

Essentially, the NFL has learned that they can sell us a garbage product (like the video above) and we’ll continue to support it like the (football) junkies we have become.

Hate Thursday Night Football?

Tune in to Thursday Night Football?

For most NFL fans the answers are ‘yes’ and ‘yes’.

As long as the league has your eyes on primetime on Thursday they can continue to rake in cash in television advertising and now even more so in 2014 than in 2013 due to these ratings increases.

In many ways, this is the league’s philosophy in numerous aspects of their development. They’re going to push the limits of the fan base as far as they possible can and back away just before we say we’ve had enough.

Do we really need two games in London?

No, but the fans supported one game, so now the league will try two and see if they can make more money without too much backlash.

Should the Pro Bowl go away or be transformed?

Absolutely, but it gets higher ratings than the MLB All-Star game, so how much should it really be altered?

The same is true for rule changes. Fans universally hate to see big hits penalized and quarterbacks over protected by outrageous and unrealistic regulations. But not enough people have turned off their TVs, turned in their season tickets or stopped purchasing NFL merchandise to do anything about it.

Let’s face it, the NFL is on top of the world!

They could leave their product completely unchanged if they wanted and continue to reign supreme over Major League Baseball, the National Basketball Association and National Hockey League, but there’s more money out there.

Roger Goodell and company are going to continue to test our limits to find those few extra Benjamins.

What should the NFL do with Thursday Night Football and football in Europe?
Keep Both (10%)
Keep Thursday Night Football Only (23%)
Keep Football in Europe Only (6%)
Ditch them both (61%)
This poll has completed. Thank you for voting.

7 Raves on “MEDIA WATCHDOG: NFL Testing Fans Limits And Winning

  1. Frank on said:

    >> Hate Thursday Night Football?
    >> Tune in to Thursday Night Football?
    >> For most NFL fans the answers are ‘yes’ and ‘yes’.

    Really? Do you think most fans hate TNF? I would watch football every night of the week LOL. I don’t care for the London games because logistically it’s not one I can easily attend in person.

  2. Ed in ON on said:

    Agreed….

    I just hate that the matchups are awful. I think the league should discuss with the teams, and offer that the teams involved in a thursday night matchup should always have a home game the week before. FYI, no one complains about playing on thanksgiving, which is a thursday- they love it.
    I think if the quality of the matchups rose, and the teams were allowed to have a home game the week before to limit the travel, i think everyone would be fine with it….

  3. Ebuhuel on said:

    I can understand thursday night games can take away preparation wich you normally need for every team. It would be only fair to keep all games on sunday and monday so every team would have almost the same preparation time

    About the european games, i love them. Basicly cause i live in europe and it is the only chance i can actually see a game. And for the teams it is not a big difference if they would have to travel and play in London or San Diego. You should get your facts straight though, next year there are allready 3 games in London, i would love to see one in Amsterdam or Berlin though. Owners were even thinking about the possibility to put a franchise in London. If only the Ravens would play a game in europe i could finally see them again :-) Why do they play in London you ask? Well because the teams giving up a home game can’t fill a stadium with fans and if they go to london they have a stadium full of european fans.

  4. paulie on said:

    Not worth my time. I’d watch NCAA Division II first. Better product – they play hard and I’m not expecting anything fancy . . .

  5. SykesvilleRavensFan on said:

    The worst thing about Thursday Night Football is listening to Mike Mayock pronounce words that contain an “s” – for instance the Theattle Theahawkth.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 

Hot off the street

Ravens Should Give McClain Another Shot

So Rolando McClain showed up late for a workout in front of Ravens’ officials yesterday and then promptly failed his conditioning test. Same old Rolando? Maybe, maybe not. It’s easy to as...read more

Ravens Round 1 Draft Profile: Zack Martin

The third player profile in our series centers on the best of South Bend in 2013. Zach Martin, former offensive lineman for the Fighting Irish, played multiple positions along the offensive line durin...read more

McClain Comeback Has a Setback

Don’t hold your breath waiting for inside linebacker Rolando McClain’s return to the Ravens. According to NFL Network, McClain showed up late for a Tuesday workout with the Ravens, and failed t...read more

Tuesday’s Roundup: Smith & Webb Talk Trash

Charges Against Deonte Thompson Dropped Two months ago, wide receiver Deonte Thompson was arrested on suspicion of possession of drug paraphernalia and marijuana in Gainesville, Florida. Over the wee...read more

Could Ravens Go “All Irish” Early in 2014 Draft?

The Ravens have done a lot this offseason to surround quarterback Joe Flacco with more options in the passing game, and to provide him with better protection to give him more time in the pocket. Re...read more

View More