Ravens Offense Should be Taylor Made

Joe Flacco, Tyrod Taylor
(AP Photo/Patrick Semansky)

Opinions amongst fans are always varied when it comes to their team’s offensive coordinator. The love/hate nature is inevitable.

Regardless of prior successes said coordinator has enjoyed, one fact resonates: The NFL is a “What have you done for me lately?” league.

The situation that Jim Caldwell is in the midst of is a unique one—perhaps a mystery that can’t be solved. Is it really his fault? What can he really do with the lack of play-making weapons?

No, the Ravens offensive struggles don’t all fall upon the shoulders of the Ravens’ play-caller. Joe Flacco has to step it up; the dismal offensive line has to play better; and often times, Flacco looks down field to see his “receiving corps” covered like a corpse—these guys sometimes simply can’t get open.

Caldwell can’t change the lackluster play, but he can get creative.


It seems like a pretty simple word, but in today’s NFL—the level of creativity seems to range from the 2008 Miami Dolphins wildcat overkill to the mind-numbing Cam Cameron offense.

There’s no need to be extreme with the “option scheme” or wide-receiver passes to quarterbacks—that’s what college ball is for. A common misconception is that to make an offense creative, a coordinator needs to be fired because he isn’t capable of calling an inspired game plan. That’s far from the truth.

You and I could call creative plays—it’s a matter of using the right weapons with a…dare I say it… change of pace.

At this point, Joe Flacco is the guy and deserves to be the starting quarterback. Look around—who else would you like heaving 30+ throws a game? But just because the $120 million dollar quarterback is the best option doesn’t mean he needs to be on the field every play of the game.

Take this into consideration: if 50-percent of the NFL is game-planning, then why shouldn’t coaches do everything possible to make their opponent use additional time and think about what might happen. Is that such a far-fetched idea?

Take Tyrod Taylor as an example. Before you stop, skim through the rest of this article and blast me in the comments section, hear me out. I am in no way saying that Taylor should be used at quarterback for the Ravens, or even be relied upon to make big plays.

There’s an undeniable truth that has surrounded Taylor since the beginning of his play at Virginia Tech—he has pure football play making ability. With John Harbaugh at the helm however, it seems as though no matter the coordinator, Taylor can’t stop riding the pine for the entire game unless there’s next to nothing to play for.

I’ve yet to notice an explanation on why Taylor isn’t getting playing time as a change-of-pace player. At Virginia Tech, all he did was make plays for the Hokies—akin to the way he has during Ravens preseason games. Simply put he has shined.

Even though his pocket passing skills aren’t the sharpest, his athleticism can easily compare to that of Russell Wilson. In fact, Tyrod ran a 4.51 at the 2011 NFL Scouting Combine, faster than Wilson’s 4.55. This isn’t inferring that the VT alum is better than Wilson; it merely states that the skills are present when he has the football.

He’s not going to gain 10+ yards on every play, but simply showing him as an option more frequently is going to keep defenses on their toes not only on Sunday, but during the week in the prep rooms.

Why not use Taylor as a decoy? If you put Flacco in the shotgun with Taylor in the slot as a distraction, can you imagine what kind of chaos would erupt on the defensive side of the ball? At that point, with just a simple change of personnel, the offense can do anything. Flacco could run a normal pass play; he could hand the ball off to the back next to him; or even incorporate a “wild-cat” style of play if he sees an obvious mismatch against a DE/OLB.

(More debate on this topic here in our forums)

What is the worst that can happen?

Tandon Doss loses a few snaps?

Even if the production isn’t there—which it likely will be—the defense has to think a little more and thinking slows down defenders. Moreover it’s something that future opponents will need to prepare and account for.

Caldwell doesn’t have to use Taylor 15 times a game, but there is no excuse not to use him at all. There is no excuse for Taylor to have just ONE touch this entire season.

The coaches have a weapon taking up a spot on their 53-man roster.

Maybe using him might ignite a spark.

And why not?

Clearly the NFL’s 30th ranked offense could use one.



This entry was posted in Blog View, Featured by Joe Wedra. Bookmark the permalink.

About Joe Wedra

Joe Wedra
Joe is an NFL enthusiast that spends way too much time studying tape, but he wouldn't want it any other way. Joe can be found on Twitter @JoeWedra, where he'll tweet out everything from Ravens analysis to scouting reports on Division II offensive line prospects...all for the love of the...more

9 Raves on “Ravens Offense Should be Taylor Made

  1. BoldinRaver on said:

    Funny to me when I read how good an idea it is to have a second offense to complicate things for the opposing defense, but never mention of the complications that might make for the offense.

  2. NoneYa on said:

    Tyrod deserves some play time, he is good and we need to utilize him more. Sorry to say but what we have going on is not working. This is not going to be a Superbowl year for us and there is nothing wrong with that. We need to find a leader and teach these young guys how it’s done. I say put Tyrod in for a few plays every now and then.

  3. Jason p. on said:

    That’s funny. A wild-cat formation is ordinarily used to alleviate a lack in a singular QB ability. so reading this, the proposed idea states the ravens doesn’t have a sufficient QB at all.. No matter, this team was supposed to be in rebuild phase but has definitely fell to imploding.

  4. C.J. Avent on said:

    Clearly Joe isn’t saying that Tyrod should take over half or even a quarter of Flacco’s reps. But it makes sense to input Tyrod because he’s a playmaker with other abilities than being a quarterback. Don’t act like you all weren’t excited to see him make that 14-yard run!

    • Candygirl on said:

      You know what’s funny. In that game he had the most rushing yards in that game and all he ran 14 yards. No telling what he could do if he touched the ball 2 or 3 times. lol

  5. Jrock on said:

    Why not. B/c y’all don’t want to see Flacco loose his job lol. He sucks. Backup qbs are outplaying him. Every qb we faced this year out played him. Except for scuab. He also sucks lol

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


Hot off the street

Ravens’ Ability to Put Aside Distractions Defines Season

What defines a team seeking great results in a season? The teams that have found themselves successful have often been the ones who have best been able to overcome adversity. The 2014 season of the...read more

Ravens Look to Deliver a Knockout Blow in Cincinnati

Ravens at Bengals: What to Look For SQUATTERS: The Bengals will more than likely be without the services of AJ Green on Sunday and that allows defensive coordinator Dean Pees to take some chances tha...read more

CRAB BAG: Rumble in the Jungle

With A.J. Green listed as doubtful for Sunday, there is really no excuse in my mind for the Ravens to not win. In fact, it shouldn't even be a game. The Bengals are dealing with a host of injuries - n...read more


Ravens hold Gio under 50 total yards and Jacoby Jones seals the game with a 4th quarter punt return. ~Ken Zalis Ravens get their first defensive TD of the year on an Andy Dalton interception and co...read more

Ravens @ Bengals Injury Report & Game Status

Game Status Ravens Out: TE Owen Daniels (knee); DE Chris Canty (wrist) Probable: T Eugene Monroe (knee); G Kelechi Osemele (knee); LB Daryl Smith (NIR); WR Steve Smith (NIR)   Cincinna...read more

View More